Review Request (S) 8013945: CMS fatal error: must own lock MemberNameTable_lock

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Fri May 24 03:54:11 PDT 2013


Hi Serguei,

You can avoid the code duplication if you use the safepoint check to 
assign either the MemberNameTable_lock or NULL to a Mutex variable:

Mutex* lock = (atsafepoint ? NULL : MemberNameTable_lock);
{
    MutexLockerEx ml(lock, ...);
    ...
}

David

On 24/05/2013 7:29 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> Please, review the fix for:
>    bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8013945
>    jbs: https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8013945
>
> Open webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2013/hotspot/8013945-JVMTI-JSR292.1/
>
>
> Summary:
>    CMS calls InstanceKlass::release_C_heap_structures() concurrently.
>    The "delete mnt" needs to take MemberNameTable_lock if
> !SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint().
>
> Testing:
>    The vm/mlvm and Nashorn tests, the tests listed in the bug report
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei


More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list