-Xint: template or c++ interpreter?

[Volker Simonis]

Hi Francis,

as Bob pointed out, choosing the C++ vs. the Template Interpreter is
currently a compile time decision. And I think
it won't be easy to change that, because you will probably get name
clashes with the current source code.

Regards,
Volker

PS: by the way, your example is still compile time.

On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Francis ANDRE
<francis.andre.kampbell at orange.fr> wrote:
> Bob
>
> I would like to distinguished at run time the kind of interpreter used.
> Would something like that be acceptable or is there another way to publish
> it? (may be the wording is bad, but that's an idea).
>
> const char* Abstract_VM_Version::vm_info_string() {
>   switch (Arguments::mode()) {
>     case Arguments::_int:
> #ifdef CC_INTERP
>       return UseSharedSpaces ? "code base interpreted mode, sharing" : "code
> base interpreted mode";
> #else
>       return UseSharedSpaces ? "template interpreted mode, sharing" :
> "template interpreted mode";
> #endif // CC_INTERP
>     case Arguments::_mixed:
>       return UseSharedSpaces ? "mixed mode, sharing"       : "mixed mode";
>     case Arguments::_comp:
>       return UseSharedSpaces ? "compiled mode, sharing"    : "compiled
> mode";
>   };
>
> Francis
>
> Le 26/10/2013 23:27, Bob Vandette a écrit :
>
>> Compiling Hotspot with CC_INTERP does exclude the template interpreter.
>> You either build a template Interpreter or C++ Interpreter.
>>
>> Bob.
>>
>> On Oct 26, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Francis ANDRE
>> <francis.andre.kampbell at orange.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> The -Xint option specifies to the JVM to run only in interpreted mode,
>>> but since compiling the JVM with CC_INTERP do not exclude the template
>>> Interpreter, I am wondering if there is an option to specify that only the
>>> template Interpreter or only the C++ Interpreter be used?
>>>
>>> Francis
>>
>>
>