RFR: 8054823: Add size_t as a valid VM flag type

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Good.

Thanks,
Vladimir

On 8/11/14 10:46 AM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
> On 2014-08-11 18:35, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Stefan,
>>
>> Seems fine to me,
>
> Thanks for reviewing!
>
>> except new tests don't have correct @bug.
>>
>> 27  * The test helsp verifying that size_t flags can be set/read.
>>                ^ typo
>>
>> SizeTTest.java - remove @author
>
> Too much copy-n-paste. I've updated the patch and did some additional
> cleanups to the jtreg annotations:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8054823/webrev.01.delta/
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8054823/webrev.01/
>
> thanks,
> StefanK
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vladimir
>>
>> On 8/11/14 6:48 AM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I propose that we add 'size_t' as a valid VM flag type. This will
>>> help with type safety, since we won't have to cast
>>> back and forth between the two types.
>>>
>>> This patch adds the framework, but only changes one of the flags. I
>>> choose to change one of our experimental flags, so
>>> that I could write tests for this change.
>>>
>>> Please, review this patch:
>>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8054823/webrev.00/
>>>   https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054823
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> StefanK
>