RFR (XS): 8035983: Fix "Native frames:" in crash report (hs_err file)
Christian Thalinger
christian.thalinger at oracle.com
Thu Feb 27 17:38:24 PST 2014
On Feb 27, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035983
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/8035983/webrev/
>
> We don't print whole stack if native frames intermix with compiled java frames (on x86 fp is used by compiled code).
> Instead of using os::is_first_C_frame() which produces incorrect result for compiled java frames I am suggesting to look on frame's stack pointer relative to stack base.
I have two questions:
1) Why does this work:
+ // Catch very first native frame by using stack address.
+ if (!_thread->on_local_stack((address)(fr.sp() + 4))) break;
Because we set the stack base to the current value when we start the thread?
2) Why does this not work? I have seen many correct stack traces in the past.
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
> Output before the fix:
>
> Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
> V [libjvm.so+0x1e28428] void VMError::report(outputStream*)+0x1478
> V [libjvm.so+0x1e29dd4] void VMError::report_and_die()+0x6b4
> V [libjvm.so+0x14ad9ba] void report_vm_error(const char*,int,const char*,const char*)+0x9a
> V [libjvm.so+0x1b6ccf5] void ObjectMonitor::exit(bool,Thread*)+0x125
> V [libjvm.so+0x1d41cda] void ObjectSynchronizer::fast_exit(oopDesc*,BasicLock*,Thread*)+0x38a
> V [libjvm.so+0x1d41fba] void ObjectSynchronizer::slow_exit(oopDesc*,BasicLock*,Thread*)+0x2a
> V [libjvm.so+0x1caa13f] void SharedRuntime::complete_monitor_unlocking_C(oopDesc*,BasicLock*)+0x27f
>
>
> After the fix:
>
> Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
> V [libjvm.so+0x1e28428] void VMError::report(outputStream*)+0x1478
> V [libjvm.so+0x1e29dd4] void VMError::report_and_die()+0x6b4
> V [libjvm.so+0x14ad9ba] void report_vm_error(const char*,int,const char*,const char*)+0x9a
> V [libjvm.so+0x1b6ccf5] void ObjectMonitor::exit(bool,Thread*)+0x125
> V [libjvm.so+0x1d41cda] void ObjectSynchronizer::fast_exit(oopDesc*,BasicLock*,Thread*)+0x38a
> V [libjvm.so+0x1d41fba] void ObjectSynchronizer::slow_exit(oopDesc*,BasicLock*,Thread*)+0x2a
> V [libjvm.so+0x1caa13f] void SharedRuntime::complete_monitor_unlocking_C(oopDesc*,BasicLock*)+0x27f
> J 13 C2 java.util.Hashtable.get(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object; (69 bytes) @ 0xffff80ffb979da84 [0xffff80ffb979d700+0x384]
> J 10% C2 Test.Worker()V (381 bytes) @ 0xffff80ffb97a1c8c [0xffff80ffb97a1840+0x44c]
> j Test$1.run()V+0
> v ~StubRoutines::call_stub
> V [libjvm.so+0x177d196] void JavaCalls::call_helper(JavaValue*,methodHandle*,JavaCallArguments*,Thread*)+0x886
> V [libjvm.so+0x1b9a6c8] void os::os_exception_wrapper(void(*)(JavaValue*,methodHandle*,JavaCallArguments*,Thread*),JavaValue*,methodHandle*,JavaCallArguments*,Thread*)+0x38
> V [libjvm.so+0x177c90a] void JavaCalls::call(JavaValue*,methodHandle,JavaCallArguments*,Thread*)+0x9a
> V [libjvm.so+0x177be70] void JavaCalls::call_virtual(JavaValue*,KlassHandle,Symbol*,Symbol*,JavaCallArguments*,Thread*)+0x250
> V [libjvm.so+0x177bf56] void JavaCalls::call_virtual(JavaValue*,Handle,KlassHandle,Symbol*,Symbol*,Thread*)+0x66
> V [libjvm.so+0x1896897] void thread_entry(JavaThread*,Thread*)+0xc7
> V [libjvm.so+0x1d8f23e] void JavaThread::thread_main_inner()+0x18e
> V [libjvm.so+0x1d8f09a] void JavaThread::run()+0x1fa
> V [libjvm.so+0x1b8f3c8] java_start+0x248
> C [libc.so.1+0x122105] _thrp_setup+0xa5
> C [libc.so.1+0x1223b0] _lwp_start+0x0
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list