RFR (XS): 8035983: Fix "Native frames:" in crash report (hs_err file)

Coleen Phillimore coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
Fri Feb 28 11:14:39 PST 2014


I think this is fine but could we replace is_first_C_frame() uses with 
this expression that determines if the fp is not on the stack?   Would 
that be a useful further cleanup?
thanks,
Coleen

On 2/27/14 9:08 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>
>
> On 2/27/14 5:38 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Vladimir Kozlov 
>> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035983
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/8035983/webrev/
>>>
>>> We don't print whole stack if native frames intermix with compiled 
>>> java frames (on x86 fp is used by compiled code).
>>> Instead of using os::is_first_C_frame() which produces incorrect 
>>> result for compiled java frames I am suggesting to look on frame's 
>>> stack pointer relative to stack base.
>>
>> I have two questions:
>>
>> 1) Why does this work:
>>
>> +              // Catch very first native frame by using stack address.
>> +              if (!_thread->on_local_stack((address)(fr.sp() + 4))) 
>> break;
>>
>> Because we set the stack base to the current value when we start the 
>> thread?
>
> You are right not all threads have stack base set (all VM's thread 
> do). So I need to add check for stack_size() != 0 and use 
> is_first_C_frame() if it is 0 (uninitialized).
>
>>
>> 2) Why does this not work?  I have seen many correct stack traces in 
>> the past.
>
> Look on os::is_first_C_frame(). It does some stupid simple checks 
> which nothing to do with real value. The test will pass if a java 
> compiled code has a pointer in EBP register.
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>> Output before the fix:
>>>
>>> Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, 
>>> C=native code)
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1e28428]  void VMError::report(outputStream*)+0x1478
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1e29dd4]  void VMError::report_and_die()+0x6b4
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x14ad9ba]  void report_vm_error(const char*,int,const 
>>> char*,const char*)+0x9a
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1b6ccf5]  void ObjectMonitor::exit(bool,Thread*)+0x125
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1d41cda]  void 
>>> ObjectSynchronizer::fast_exit(oopDesc*,BasicLock*,Thread*)+0x38a
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1d41fba]  void 
>>> ObjectSynchronizer::slow_exit(oopDesc*,BasicLock*,Thread*)+0x2a
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1caa13f]  void 
>>> SharedRuntime::complete_monitor_unlocking_C(oopDesc*,BasicLock*)+0x27f
>>>
>>>
>>> After the fix:
>>>
>>> Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, 
>>> C=native code)
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1e28428]  void VMError::report(outputStream*)+0x1478
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1e29dd4]  void VMError::report_and_die()+0x6b4
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x14ad9ba]  void report_vm_error(const char*,int,const 
>>> char*,const char*)+0x9a
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1b6ccf5]  void ObjectMonitor::exit(bool,Thread*)+0x125
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1d41cda]  void 
>>> ObjectSynchronizer::fast_exit(oopDesc*,BasicLock*,Thread*)+0x38a
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1d41fba]  void 
>>> ObjectSynchronizer::slow_exit(oopDesc*,BasicLock*,Thread*)+0x2a
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1caa13f]  void 
>>> SharedRuntime::complete_monitor_unlocking_C(oopDesc*,BasicLock*)+0x27f
>>> J 13 C2 
>>> java.util.Hashtable.get(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object; (69 
>>> bytes) @ 0xffff80ffb979da84 [0xffff80ffb979d700+0x384]
>>> J 10% C2 Test.Worker()V (381 bytes) @ 0xffff80ffb97a1c8c 
>>> [0xffff80ffb97a1840+0x44c]
>>> j  Test$1.run()V+0
>>> v  ~StubRoutines::call_stub
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x177d196]  void 
>>> JavaCalls::call_helper(JavaValue*,methodHandle*,JavaCallArguments*,Thread*)+0x886
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1b9a6c8]  void 
>>> os::os_exception_wrapper(void(*)(JavaValue*,methodHandle*,JavaCallArguments*,Thread*),JavaValue*,methodHandle*,JavaCallArguments*,Thread*)+0x38
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x177c90a]  void 
>>> JavaCalls::call(JavaValue*,methodHandle,JavaCallArguments*,Thread*)+0x9a 
>>>
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x177be70]  void 
>>> JavaCalls::call_virtual(JavaValue*,KlassHandle,Symbol*,Symbol*,JavaCallArguments*,Thread*)+0x250
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x177bf56]  void 
>>> JavaCalls::call_virtual(JavaValue*,Handle,KlassHandle,Symbol*,Symbol*,Thread*)+0x66
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1896897]  void thread_entry(JavaThread*,Thread*)+0xc7
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1d8f23e]  void JavaThread::thread_main_inner()+0x18e
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1d8f09a]  void JavaThread::run()+0x1fa
>>> V  [libjvm.so+0x1b8f3c8]  java_start+0x248
>>> C  [libc.so.1+0x122105]  _thrp_setup+0xa5
>>> C  [libc.so.1+0x1223b0]  _lwp_start+0x0
>>



More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list