RFR: JDK-8030796: Update hotspot jprt.properties to release jdk9

[David Holmes]

On 31/12/2013 8:43 AM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>
> Erik,
> I'm confused by this - since hsx is no longer supported, can you just
> change jdk8 to jdk9 and delete the other releases from this file?

There is a lot of legacy stuff (even beyond hsx) in jprt.properties that 
could/should be cleaned out in my opinion.

David

Do
> you need a sponsor?
> thanks,
> Coleen
>
> On 12/19/2013 12:26 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>> Hi Erik:
>>
>>> So for the hotspot change, please consider this a new review.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030796
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8030793/webrev.01/
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>>
>> /Tim
>>
>>> On 2013-12-19 14:09, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>>> Thanks for the review,
>>>>
>>>> Since the root repo part of this change is quite urgent, I split out
>>>> a new bug for the Hotspot part, which also might warrant more
>>>> discussion.
>>>>
>>>> /Erik
>>>>
>>>> On 2013-12-19 13:51, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>>>> Looks good to me. Thanks Eric.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Chris.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19 Dec 2013, at 12:30, Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review these changes to make/jprt.poperties and
>>>>>> hotspot/make/jprt.properties. I've just added a jdk9 configuration
>>>>>> to JPRT and this change is needed for JDK 9 to start using it.
>>>>>> This will solve the issue of requiring a jdk8 boot when building
>>>>>> in JPRT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the hotspot version of the file, there is a lot of separate
>>>>>> configuration for jdk7 and jdk8. I didn't dare touch this now and
>>>>>> opted to just add the jdk9 version of these variables. I would
>>>>>> guess that this won't be necessary however since hotspot won't be
>>>>>> delivered to multiple jdk releases anymore?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8030793/webrev.01/
>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030793
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm still unclear on where the hotspot change needs to go and if I
>>>>>> need a separate bug for it? My interpretation is that the root
>>>>>> repo change should go to jdk9/dev and the hotspot change to
>>>>>> jdk9/hs-rt and that since these changes are using separate routes,
>>>>>> a separate bug should be used. I also assume that as a jdk9
>>>>>> reviewer, I will be able to push this myself (after review) to the
>>>>>> hotspot repo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Erik
>>>>
>>>
>>
>