Changing lots of files - mainly GC code

[Coleen Phillmore]

Hi Jesper,
The runtime changes look great, thanks!   I suggest pushing them all 
together in hs-gc so there's a single changeset.  I don't see any merge 
difficulty with these changes.
Thanks!
Coleen

On 1/13/2014 8:13 AM, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote:
> Hi Coleen!
>
> I accidentally browsed the runtime directory this weekend and found 
> about 70 typos. I have updated the webrev to include these.
>
> Do you want me to push them as part of the GC-fix? (If so, please 
> review the runtime-part of the change ;-) )
> /Jesper
>
>
> Coleen Phillmore skrev 10/1/14 4:54 PM:
>> Seems fine with me also.  Could you find typos in the comments in the 
>> runtime
>> code "by accident" too? :)
>> thanks,
>> Coleen
>>
>> On 1/10/2014 10:39 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>> On 1/10/14 5:49 AM, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have a change out for review that fixes a huge pile of typos in the
>>>> comments in the GC code. The RFR was sent to the GC list, but I 
>>>> want to give
>>>> a heads up in case anyone else is changing GC code and want to 
>>>> avoid merge
>>>> conflicts.
>>>>
>>>> The patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jwilhelm/8025856/webrev.1/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are also a few files where I happened to find a few typos "by 
>>>> accident"
>>>> in code that is not strictly GC code. These are:
>>>>
>>>> src/share/vm/memory/heap.cpp
>>>> src/share/vm/memory/heap.hpp
>>>> src/share/vm/memory/allocation.hpp
>>>> src/share/vm/memory/resourceArea.hpp
>>>> src/share/vm/runtime/thread.cpp
>>>>
>>>> There is a total of eight typos fixed in these files so I think the 
>>>> risk of
>>>> merge conflicts here is minimal. Are there any objections to 
>>>> including these
>>>> fixes in the change?
>>>
>>> Vote: go for it!
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> /Jesper
>>>
>>