Bring Zero to llvm 3.4

[Mario Torre]

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 17:49 -0800, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2014, at 5:54 AM, Mario Torre <neugens at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 14:44 +0100, Mikael Gerdin wrote:
> >> Hi Mario
> >> 
> >> On Monday 03 March 2014 14.28.33 Mario Torre wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 16:39 +0100, Mario Torre wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 15:50 +0100, Mikael Gerdin wrote:
> >>>>>> Interesting...
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Indeed, what version of webrev are you using?
> >>>>> The .changeset file created by recent versions of webrev has the
> >>>>> advantage
> >>>>> that it contains HG meta-information about which change the patch was
> >>>>> created from.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I used the one that comes from within the JDK8 repository (cloned
> >>>> sometime on Friday). I run webrev from a mercurial patch queue with the
> >>>> applied patch, which should be visible as a committed changeset I think.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Mario
> >>> 
> >>> Hello Mikael,
> >>> 
> >>> The patch applied without modification on JDK9, here's the actual
> >>> webrev:
> >>> 
> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/zero-2014-02-24/webrev.02/
> >>> 
> >>> If the patch is OK, can you please push it for me?
> >> 
> >> Unfortunately I'm not too familiar with the Zero/Shark code or the makefiles 
> >> so I wouldn't feel comfortable putting my name as a reviewer on these changes. 
> >> 
> >> I'm sure that whoever reviews this change can push it for you as well.
> >> 
> >> /Mikael
> > 
> > Hi Mikael,
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > Anyone that can review it? Christian maybe?
> 
> Sure.  Looks good to me.
> 

Thanks a ton!

I guess I can't push it myself, right? :)

Can you please push the patch on 9 on my behalf?

I also would like to push it on 8u, but I think I need to ask a backport
on the 8u mailing list fist, right?

Cheers,
Mario