Bring Zero to llvm 3.4

[Christian Thalinger]

On Mar 4, 2014, at 12:06 AM, Mario Torre <neugens at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 17:49 -0800, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>> On Mar 3, 2014, at 5:54 AM, Mario Torre <neugens at redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 14:44 +0100, Mikael Gerdin wrote:
>>>> Hi Mario
>>>> 
>>>> On Monday 03 March 2014 14.28.33 Mario Torre wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 16:39 +0100, Mario Torre wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 15:50 +0100, Mikael Gerdin wrote:
>>>>>>>> Interesting...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Indeed, what version of webrev are you using?
>>>>>>> The .changeset file created by recent versions of webrev has the
>>>>>>> advantage
>>>>>>> that it contains HG meta-information about which change the patch was
>>>>>>> created from.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I used the one that comes from within the JDK8 repository (cloned
>>>>>> sometime on Friday). I run webrev from a mercurial patch queue with the
>>>>>> applied patch, which should be visible as a committed changeset I think.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Mario
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Mikael,
>>>>> 
>>>>> The patch applied without modification on JDK9, here's the actual
>>>>> webrev:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/zero-2014-02-24/webrev.02/
>>>>> 
>>>>> If the patch is OK, can you please push it for me?
>>>> 
>>>> Unfortunately I'm not too familiar with the Zero/Shark code or the makefiles 
>>>> so I wouldn't feel comfortable putting my name as a reviewer on these changes. 
>>>> 
>>>> I'm sure that whoever reviews this change can push it for you as well.
>>>> 
>>>> /Mikael
>>> 
>>> Hi Mikael,
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Anyone that can review it? Christian maybe?
>> 
>> Sure.  Looks good to me.
>> 
> 
> Thanks a ton!
> 
> I guess I can't push it myself, right? :)

Nope :-)

> 
> Can you please push the patch on 9 on my behalf?

Yes, I will take care of it.

> 
> I also would like to push it on 8u, but I think I need to ask a backport
> on the 8u mailing list fist, right?

Correct.

> 
> Cheers,
> Mario