Wish to push fix for 8037816 into main

[Alejandro E Murillo]

On 5/10/2014 5:52 AM, David Chase wrote:
> I think so.
that's correct. They will get about a week of nightly testing
on all group repos.
These changes will be in next week snapshot
and then integrated into jdk9/dev/hotspot around Tuesday 5/20

Alejandro
>
> It went here: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/hotspot/rev/53a41e7cbe05
> (With its corresponding closed change, where I goofed and left you off the list of reviewers, sorry.)
>
> David
>
> On 2014-05-10, at 7:27 AM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/05/2014 6:02 AM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
>>> No, this is the one:
>>>
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/hotspot
>> So to be clear, this is being pushed into hs/hotspot so that it will be pulled down into the hotspot group repos, but it won't get pushed up to jdk9/dev until the next snapshot - right ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>>> Alejandro
>>>
>>> On 5/9/2014 2:01 PM, David Chase wrote:
>>>> Alejandro, which repository do I push to?
>>>>
>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/hotspot?
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2014-05-09, at 2:44 PM, Alejandro E Murillo
>>>> <alejandro.murillo at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I just took the weekly snapshot,
>>>>> so now is a good timing to do that, as then it will be picked up
>>>>> by all the group repos when they synch down
>>>>>
>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/9/2014 12:37 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>>>>> Good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We want to push it into main jdk9/hs/hotspot and let groups to pull
>>>>>> it into their repos. It will allow to test it in all our
>>>>>> configurations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Vladimir
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/9/14 11:28 AM, David Chase wrote:
>>>>>>> Here's the webrev, minus automated copyright insertions:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drchase/8037816/webrev-9.05-09b/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's large, it touches a lot, and I can build on Mavericks
>>>>>>> (with the addition of a one-time fix to header files, not sure
>>>>>>> how to automate that).  It sets attributes to turn on format checking,
>>>>>>> and formats are mostly/often checked -- there are disabling macros
>>>>>>> for problematic files, but I fixed all the true stinkers by hand.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have thumbs up from Vladimir Kozlov and Stefan Karlsson.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And this gets it in everyone's face sooner, because we might
>>>>>>> want to do this to 8u20 just so that backports won't be too horrible.
>>>>>>> (A backport patch is already prepared, being further studied for
>>>>>>> mistakes, and has been JPRT-tested.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>

-- 
Alejandro