PATCH: swapped usage of idx_t and bm_word_t types in parMarkBitMap.cpp

[Thomas Schatzl]

Hi,

On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 11:59 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2014 11:23:48 +0200
> Thomas Schatzl <thomas.schatzl at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Dan,
> > 
> > On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 10:19 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
[...]
> > > This a follow-up of my earlier s390 related patch [2]
> > > 
> > > [1] http://fedora.danny.cz/openjdk/bitmap-1/webrev/
> > > [2]
> > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2013-September/010913.html
> > > 
> > > Note: I'm Red Hat employee (dhorak at redhat.com), so I should be
> > > covered by Red Hat's CLA for my contributions.
> > > 
> > 
> > Created https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043722 .
> > 
> > I roughly looked at other similar changes, shouldn't line 129 in
> > g1/concurrentMark.cpp changed too?
> > 
> > 129  _bm.set_map((uintptr_t*)_virtual_space.low());
> > 
> > @Compiler team: what about the instantiations of MethodLivenessResult?
> > 
> > I.e. in methodLiveness.cpp:476 and 1001 there are two other uintptr_t*
> > casts.
> 
> they don't fail the build because bm_word_t is uintptr_t, but in my
> opinion they should be changed too, at least for consistency

Can you check the patch at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8043722/webrev/ for S390? It builds
on all Oracle platforms.

If so, your change has been reviewed by me.

Thanks,
  Thomas