RFR (L): 8062370: Various minor code improvements

[Coleen Phillimore]

This looks good and I can sponsor this.   There is one typo:

+ *  respectivly, with the following differences:


should be 'respectively'.  The new comment is much clearer.

thanks,
Coleen

On 11/14/14, 4:59 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> thanks for looking. See here the corrected webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8064779/
>
> for this new bug report:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064779
> Best Regards, Thomas
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:03 AM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On 12/11/2014 8:31 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> could you please review this little addition? (added comments for
>>> jio_snprintf)
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8062370/
>>>
>> A new bug is needed for these changes.
>>
>> As people rarely look at the header file when reading the code could you
>> augment the last line of the comment in jvm.cpp from:
>>
>> +   // return always -1.
>>
>> to
>>
>> +   // always return -1, and perform null termination.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>>