[8u40] RFR backport 8058919 and 8049071
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Wed Oct 22 01:30:01 UTC 2014
Hi Vladimir,
On 22/10/2014 11:03 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Why you did not separate 8058919 from 8049071?
> I am fine with it but don't forget to list both bugs in hotspot changeset.
I had already imported both changesets before knowing I might need to
process them one at a time. It was too painful to try and revert and
then do them one at a time. As per the webrev two distinct changesets
are present - one for each bug.
Thanks for all the reviews/approvals! I can now push them all together.
David
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
> On 10/21/14 5:46 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> webrevs:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8058919-8049071/webrev.hotspot/
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8058919-8049071/webrev.top/
>>
>> 8058919: Add sanity test for minimal VM in test/Makefile
>>
>> This is a direct backport from 9:
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt/hotspot/rev/c602ed4cfca9
>>
>> ---
>>
>> 8049071: Add jtreg jobs to JPRT for hotspot
>>
>> These are direct backports from 9 on the hotspot side:
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt/hotspot/rev/a527e4909a92
>>
>> The top-level jprt.properties file had to be adjusted for the 8u
>> platforms vs 9 platforms:
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt/rev/e291a5c557d1
>>
>>
>>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list