Review request for 8058313: Mismatch of method descriptor and MethodParameters.parameters_count should cause MalformedParameterException
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Oct 30 22:52:20 UTC 2014
On 31/10/2014 3:39 AM, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Can't the hotspot and jdk portions of a fix be pushed together now?
Yes! Eric you can push hotspot and jdk test change together into
whichever team forest you are using.
David
> -Joe
>
> On 10/30/2014 10:19 AM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>> There is a test for this, which needs to be added to the jdk repo after
>> the change has propagated. I have created the following issue to track
>> this: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062556
>>
>> On 10/29/14 18:39, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please review this fix for parameter reflection which addresses hotspot
>>> falsely ignoring zero-length MethodParameter attributes. The JVMS
>>> allows a MethodParameters attribute with parameter_count = 0, and the
>>> parameter reflection spec states that a MalformedParametersException
>>> should be thrown if parameter_count does not match the number of real
>>> parameters to a method. Hotspot currently ignores MethodParameters
>>> attributes with parameter_count = 0; however, in a case where a (bad)
>>> MethodParameters attribute has parameter_count = 0, but the method has a
>>> nonzero number of real parameters, hotspot will return null from
>>> JVM_GetMethodParameters, the result being that a
>>> MalformedParametersException is not thrown (rather, the reflection API
>>> acts like there is no MethodParameters attribute).
>>>
>>> This patch causes hotspot to record the fact that a zero-length
>>> MethodParameters attribute does exist, causing the exception to be
>>> thrown when it should be.
>>>
>>> The bug is here:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058313
>>>
>>> The webrev is here:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~emc/8058313/
>>>
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list