RFR (M): 8145435: [JVMCI] some tests on Windows fail with: assert(!thread->is_Java_thread()) failed: must not be java thread

[Coleen Phillimore]

This looks like a good cleanup.
thanks!
Coleen

On 12/17/15 12:46 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:56 AM, Doug Simon <doug.simon at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 17 Dec 2015, at 08:20, Tom Rodriguez <tom.rodriguez at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I feel like there was a reason we weren’t using java_lang_Throwable::print_stack_trace but it looks like it handles the causes properly which is the only reason I could think of.  Maybe Doug knows?
>>>>>
>>>>> There are two issues with java_lang_Throwable::print_stack_trace:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. It doesn’t print the exception message, just the stack.
>>>> I’m printing the message separately:
>>>>
>>>>     java_lang_Throwable::print(exception, tty);
>>>>     tty->cr();
>>>>     java_lang_Throwable::print_stack_trace(exception(), tty);
>>> There are already 3 other copies of this idiom.  Throwable should probably have a single method for this.  Or maybe print_stack_trace itself should do this?
>> +1
>>
>>> That would better parallel Throwable.printStackTrace().
>> Makes sense to me!
> It does.  Here it goes:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/8145435/webrev.02/
>
> I’ve made java_lang_Throwable::print_stack_trace to take a Handle instead of an oop and removed the unneeded copy of java_lang_Throwable::print.
>
>> -Doug