[8u60] RFR(S): Bulk backports of Zero fixes
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Feb 26 01:09:34 UTC 2015
All changes pushed to jdk8u-hs-dev/hotspot ready for bulk integration.
One patch didn't import directly but it was just a copyright date
mismatch that I fixed manually.
David
On 25/02/2015 7:33 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 12:08 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
>> Hi Severin,
>>
>> On 25/02/2015 2:30 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to push the following 3 small Zero fixes to JDK 8u
>>> dev forest? Patches are the same as for JDK 9 modulo some copyright
>>> changes.
>>>
>>> Original JDK 9 Bugs:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064815
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067331
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067231
>>>
>>> Webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/zero-fixes-jdk8u/
>>>
>>> JDK-8064815:
>>> src/cpu/zero/vm/stack_zero.cpp
>>> src/cpu/zero/vm/stack_zero.inline.hpp
>>>
>>> JDK-8067331:
>>> src/os_cpu/bsd_zero/vm/atomic_bsd_zero.inline.hpp
>>> src/os_cpu/linux_zero/vm/atomic_linux_zero.inline.hpp
>>>
>>> JDK-8067231:
>>> src/share/vm/interpreter/interpreterRuntime.cpp
>>>
>>> Without those fixes a checkout of jdk8u doesn't even compile
>>> (--with-jvm-variants=zero). With them Zero is able to build itself on
>>> x86_64 and ppc64.
>>>
>>> I'd need a sponsor in order to get those fixes pushed.
>>
>> I can do this for you. There's only one non-zero file touched.
>
> Thank you, David! Please let me know if there is anything more you need
> from me.
>
> Cheers,
> Severin
>
>> David
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Severin
>>>
>
>
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list