RFR: 6983747: Clean up of unused dl_mutex lock.

[harold seigel]

Hi Max,

Should this comment be removed from both files?

   // Glibc-2.0 libdl is not MT safe. If you are building with any glibc,
   // chances are you might want to run the generated bits against glibc-2.0
   // libdl.so, so always use locking for any version of glibc.

Thanks, Harold

On 3/24/2015 1:01 PM, Max Ockner wrote:
> This was not intentional. I thought the comment was referring to the 
> line containing dl_mutex, but it was not. I put the comment back in.
> New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mockner/6983747.2/
> Thanks,
> Max
>
> On 3/24/2015 12:35 PM, Dmitry Dmitriev wrote:
>> Hi Max,
>>
>> Can you please tell me, you intentionally delete following comment 
>> from os_linux.cpp file:
>> 4680   // else it defaults to CLOCK_REALTIME
>>
>> It seems that this comment should be leaved. What you think about that?
>>
>> I am not a reviewer.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dmitry
>>
>> On 24.03.2015 17:56, Max Ockner wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> please review my clean up of the unused dl_mutex lock.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6983747
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mockner/6983747/
>>> Summary: Deleted all references to the dl_mutex lock which was no 
>>> longer used.
>>>
>>> Tested with jtreg runtime tests.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Max Ockner
>>
>