[9] RFR (S): 8059340: ConstantPool::_resolved_references is missing in heap dump

Christian Thalinger christian.thalinger at oracle.com
Wed May 20 01:54:37 UTC 2015


> On May 19, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the review, Serguei.
> 
> Updated webrev in place:
>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8059340/webrev.01 <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8059340/webrev.01>

Shouldn’t there be some GC code in InstanceKlass that can be removed now?

+    private transient Object[] resolved_references;

We should follow Java naming conventions and use “resolvedReferences”.

> 
> Switched to ConstantPool::resolved_references() as you suggested.
> 
> Regarding declaring the field in vmStructs.cpp, it is not needed since the field is located in Java mirror and not in InstanceKlass.
> 
> Best regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
> 
> On 5/19/15 10:47 AM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir,
>> 
>> It looks good in general.
>> Some comments are below.
>> 
>> || *src/share/vm/oops/cpCache.cpp*
>> 
>> @@ -281,11 +281,11 @@
>>    // Competing writers must acquire exclusive access via a lock.
>>    // A losing writer waits on the lock until the winner writes f1 and leaves
>>    // the lock, so that when the losing writer returns, he can use the linked
>>    // cache entry.
>> 
>> -  objArrayHandle resolved_references = cpool->resolved_references();
>> +  objArrayHandle resolved_references = cpool->pool_holder()->resolved_references();
>>    // Use the resolved_references() lock for this cpCache entry.
>>    // resolved_references are created for all classes with Invokedynamic, MethodHandle
>>    // or MethodType constant pool cache entries.
>>    assert(resolved_references() != NULL,
>>           "a resolved_references array should have been created for this class");
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> @@ -410,20 +410,20 @@
>> 
>>  oop ConstantPoolCacheEntry::appendix_if_resolved(constantPoolHandle cpool) {
>>    if (!has_appendix())
>>      return NULL;
>>    const int ref_index = f2_as_index() + _indy_resolved_references_appendix_offset;
>> -  objArrayOop resolved_references = cpool->resolved_references();
>> +  objArrayOop resolved_references = cpool->pool_holder()->resolved_references();
>>    return resolved_references->obj_at(ref_index);
>>  }
>> 
>> 
>>  oop ConstantPoolCacheEntry::method_type_if_resolved(constantPoolHandle cpool) {
>>    if (!has_method_type())
>>      return NULL;
>>    const int ref_index = f2_as_index() + _indy_resolved_references_method_type_offset;
>> -  objArrayOop resolved_references = cpool->resolved_references();
>> +  objArrayOop resolved_references = cpool->pool_holder()->resolved_references();
>>    return resolved_references->obj_at(ref_index);
>>  }
>> 
>> There is no need in the update above as the constant pool still has the
>> function resolved_references():
>> +objArrayOop ConstantPool::resolved_references() const {
>> +  return pool_holder()->resolved_references();
>> +}
>> 
>> The same is true for the files:
>>   src/share/vm/interpreter/interpreterRuntime.cpp
>>   src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeTracer.cpp
>> || src/share/vm/ci/ciEnv.cpp
>> 
>> 
>> || src/share/vm/runtime/vmStructs.cpp*
>> 
>> *@@ -286,11 +286,10 @@
>>    nonstatic_field(ConstantPool, _tags,
>> Array<u1>*)                            \
>>    nonstatic_field(ConstantPool, _cache,
>> ConstantPoolCache*)                    \
>>    nonstatic_field(ConstantPool, _pool_holder,
>> InstanceKlass*)                        \
>>    nonstatic_field(ConstantPool, _operands,
>> Array<u2>*)                            \
>>    nonstatic_field(ConstantPool, _length,
>> int)                                   \
>> -  nonstatic_field(ConstantPool, _resolved_references,
>> jobject)                               \
>>    nonstatic_field(ConstantPool, _reference_map,
>> Array<u2>*)                            \
>>    nonstatic_field(ConstantPoolCache, _length,
>> int)                                   \
>>    nonstatic_field(ConstantPoolCache, _constant_pool,
>> ConstantPool*)                         \
>>    nonstatic_field(InstanceKlass, _array_klasses,
>> Klass*)                                \
>>    nonstatic_field(InstanceKlass, _methods,
>> Array<Method*>*)                       \
>> *
>> 
>> *I guess, we need to cover the same field in the InstanceKlass instead.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/18/15 10:32 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>>> Here's updated version:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8059340/webrev.01
>>> 
>>> Moved ConstantPool::_resolved_references to mirror class instance.
>>> 
>>> Fixed a couple of issues in CDS and JVMTI (class redefinition) caused
>>> by this change.
>>> 
>>> I had to hard code Class::resolved_references offset since it is used
>>> in template interpreter which is generated earlier than j.l.Class is
>>> loaded during VM bootstrap.
>>> 
>>> Testing: hotspot/test, vm testbase (in progress)
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>> 
>>> On 4/21/15 9:30 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>>>> Coleen, Chris,
>>>> 
>>>> I'll proceed with moving ConstantPool::_resolved_references to j.l.Class
>>>> instance then.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>>> 
>>>> On 4/21/15 3:22 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 20, 2015, at 4:34 PM, Coleen Phillimore
>>>>>> <coleen.phillimore at oracle.com <mailto:coleen.phillimore at oracle.com>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think that changing the format of the heap dump isn't a good idea
>>>>>> either.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 4/16/15, 2:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>>>>>>> (sorry for really late response; just got enough time to return to
>>>>>>> the bug)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd forgotten about it!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Coleen, Staffan,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for the feedback!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> After thinking about the fix more, I don't think that using reserved
>>>>>>> oop slot in CLASS DUMP for recording _resolved_references is the best
>>>>>>> thing to do. IMO the change causes too much work for the users (heap
>>>>>>> dump analysis tools).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It needs specification update and then heap dump analyzers should be
>>>>>>> updated as well.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have 2 alternative approaches (hacky and not-so-hacky :-)):
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - artificial class static field in the dump ("<resolved_references>"
>>>>>>> + optional id to guarantee unique name);
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - add j.l.Class::_resolved_references field;
>>>>>>>   Not sure how much overhead (mostly reads from bytecode) the move
>>>>>>> from ConstantPool to j.l.Class adds, so I propose just to duplicate
>>>>>>> it for now.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I really like this second approach, so much so that I had a prototype
>>>>>> for moving resolved_references directly to the j.l.Class object about
>>>>>> a year ago.  I couldn't find any benefit other than consolidating oops
>>>>>> so the GC would have less work to do.  If the resolved_references are
>>>>>> moved to j.l.C instance, they can not be jobjects and the
>>>>>> ClassLoaderData::_handles area wouldn't have to contain them (but
>>>>>> there are other things that could go there so don't delete the
>>>>>> _handles field yet).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The change I had was relatively simple.  The only annoying part was
>>>>>> that getting to the resolved references has to be in macroAssembler
>>>>>> and do:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> go through method->cpCache->constants->instanceKlass->java_mirror()
>>>>>> rather than
>>>>>> method->cpCache->constants->resolved_references->jmethod indirection
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think it only affects the interpreter so the extra indirection
>>>>>> wouldn't affect performance, so don't duplicate it!  You don't want to
>>>>>> increase space used by j.l.C without taking it out somewhere else!
>>>>> 
>>>>> I like this approach.  Can we do this?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What do you think about that?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is this bug worth doing this?  I don't know but I'd really like it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Coleen
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 10/6/14 11:35 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>>>>>>>> This looks like a good approach. However, there are a couple of more
>>>>>>>> places that need to be updated.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The hprof binary format is described in
>>>>>>>> jdk/src/jdk.hprof.agent/share/native/libhprof/manual.html and needs
>>>>>>>> to be updated. It’s also more formally specified in hprof_b_spec.h
>>>>>>>> in the same directory.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The hprof JVMTI agent in jdk/src/jdk.hprof.agent code would also
>>>>>>>> need to be updated to show this field. Since this is a JVMTI agent
>>>>>>>> it needs to be possible to find the resolved_refrences array via the
>>>>>>>> JVMTI heap walking API. Perhaps that already works? - I haven’t
>>>>>>>> looked.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Finally, the Serviceability Agent implements yet another hprof
>>>>>>>> binary dumper in
>>>>>>>> hotspot/agent//src/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/utilities/HeapHprofBinWriter.java
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> which also needs to write this reference.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> /Staffan
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 29 sep 2014, at 16:51, Vladimir Ivanov
>>>>>>>> <vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com <mailto:vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8059340/webrev.00/
>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059340
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> VM heap dump doesn't contain ConstantPool::_resolved_references for
>>>>>>>>> classes which have resolved references.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ConstantPool::_resolved_references points to an Object[] holding
>>>>>>>>> resolved constant pool entries (patches for VM anonymous classes,
>>>>>>>>> linked CallSite & MethodType for invokedynamic instructions).
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I've decided to use reserved slot in HPROF class header format.
>>>>>>>>> It requires an update in jhat to correctly display new info.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The other approach I tried was to dump the reference as a fake
>>>>>>>>> static field [1], but storing VM internal
>>>>>>>>> ConstantPool::_resolved_references among user defined fields looks
>>>>>>>>> confusing.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Testing: manual (verified that corresponding arrays are properly
>>>>>>>>> linked in Nashorn heap dump).
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8059340/static
>>>>> 
>> 



More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list