Corrected: RFR 8059557 (XL): Validate JVM Command-Line Flag Arguments

[Gerard Ziemski]

Thank you for the feedback.  I have adopted the unnamed arguments based 
solution.


cheers

On 5/21/2015 4:31 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
> On May 21, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Gerard Ziemski <gerard.ziemski at oracle.com> wrote:
>> hi Alexander,
>>
>> Yes, handling it this way was an alternative, but I thought it required a C++ compiler with some specific feature support?  C++ 11?
>>
>> It was my understanding that such solution was more restrictive, than the one I used.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> On 5/21/2015 11:26 AM, Alexander Harlap wrote:
>>> And what about this:
>>>
>>> void emit_range_bool(const char* /* name */)            { }
> Unnamed arguments in C++ are not new; see, for example, C++ ARM 8.2.5 (p.140).
> See also C++03 8.3.5/8 Functions, and Note regarding them in 8.4/6 Function definitions.
> That’s the standard way to deal with the problem.  I’ve not heard of a compiler that is so
> stupid as to warn about that usage.
>
>
>
>