RFR 8134995(M): [REDO] GC: implement ranges (optionally constraints) for those flags that have them missing

[sangheon.kim]

On 10/05/2015 05:46 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2015, at 5:45 PM, sangheon.kim<sangheon.kim at oracle.com>  wrote:
>> On 10/05/2015 02:06 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>> On Oct 5, 2015, at 4:35 PM, sangheon.kim<sangheon.kim at oracle.com>  wrote:
>> Here's next webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sangheki/8134995/webrev.04
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sangheki/8134995/webrev.04_to_03
> I think there is still at least a potential for problems around the use of FLAG_IS_CMDLINE in
> the constraint functions, but I don’t see an actual problem at this time.  Another issue besides
> those I’ve mentioned before is that if the constraint is only active when FLAG_IS_CMDLINE
> and no command line option was given, but the option is manageable and later set through
> that interface, I think the constraint won’t check the new value being provided.  However,
> none of the options with new constraint functions using FLAG_IS_CMDLINE are manageable,
> so I think there’s no immediate problem on that score.  But there should be an RFE to
> follow up in this area.
>
> So looks good to me.
Okay, I added your point at JDK-8134348.

And thank you again for the review!

Thanks,
Sangheon