RFR: 8170888: [linux] Experimental support for cgroup memory limits in container (ie Docker) environments
Kim Barrett
kim.barrett at oracle.com
Sat Dec 10 00:22:10 UTC 2016
> On Dec 8, 2016, at 9:59 PM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170888
>
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8170888/webrev/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
src/share/vm/runtime/arguments.cpp
2050 fscanf(fp, JULONG_FORMAT, &cgroup_max);
2051 if (cgroup_max > 0) {
Missing check of fscanf result. I don't see anything in the doc for
fscanf that promises an argument won't be clobbered if there are match
failures, errors, or fewer inputs than specified in the format string.
Even if that no such clobbering happens, as written we have a really
rare failure mode -- in cgroup context, but inopportune EINTR -- that
gets reported as a parse failure warning and ignoring the cgroup limit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
src/share/vm/runtime/arguments.cpp
2054 log_info(gc, heap)("Setting phys_mem to the min of cgroup limit ("
log_info seems a little noisy, especially considering that we
ultimately announce the final ergonomic (Min|Max)HeapSize with
log_trace.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
src/share/vm/runtime/arguments.cpp
Trivial style nit:
2058 }
2059 else {
2063 }
2064 else {
should be " } else {"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list