RFR: JDK-8160356: invalid suffix on literal warning is occurred with GCC 6

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Lets not complicate the process. Currently it is the bug (compilation 
warnings with gcc6) and there is reviewed fix (very simple). Lets push 
it and be done.

Thanks,
Vladimir

On 6/27/16 8:45 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
>> However, I think this is an enhancement, as it wouldn’t be a problem if
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156980
>> were fixed, so subject to a post-FC exemption or deferral to JDK 10.
>
> I want to add FC extention label to this issue.
> Can I add it now?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yasumasa
>
>
> On 2016/06/28 7:59, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga <yasuenag at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This review request relates to JDK-8160310: HotSpot cannot be built
>>> with GCC 6 .
>>>
>>> I encountered invalid suffix on literal when I compiled OpenJDK 9
>>> with GCC 6
>>> on Fedora 24 x64.
>>> I think these error should be fixed.
>>>
>>> I uploaded webrev.
>>> Could you review it?
>>>
>>>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8160356/webrev.00/
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm jdk 9 committer, but I cannot access JPRT.
>>> So I need a sponsor.
>>
>> This looks good.
>>
>> However, I think this is an enhancement, as it wouldn’t be a problem if
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156980
>> were fixed, so subject to a post-FC exemption or deferral to JDK 10.
>>