RFR (M) 8164921: Memory leaked when instrumentation.retransformClasses() is called repeatedly
Dmitry Samersoff
dmitry.samersoff at oracle.com
Sat Oct 1 07:26:26 UTC 2016
Coleen,
> Or something but the loops seem simple enough to me.
OK. Thank you for explanation.
-Dmitry
On 2016-10-01 01:44, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>
>
> On 9/30/16 3:46 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
>> Coleen,
>>
>> My $.02
>>
>> 1.
>> metaspace.cpp:279 we have assert(word_size >= _small_block_min_size,
>> ...) so at 868 and 895
>> if (word_size < SmallBlocks::small_block_min_size()) {
>> probably should be asserts as well
>>
>>
>> 2.
>> It might be better to rewrite loops at metaspace.cpp 261,268
>> for (uint i = _small_block_min_size; i < _small_block_max_size; i++) {
>> as
>> for (uint i = 0;
>> i < (_small_block_max_size - _small_block_min_size); ++i) {
>> ...
>
> for (uint i = _small_block_min_size; i < _small_block_max_size; i++) {
> _small_lists[i - _small_block_min_size].set_size(i);
> }
>
>
> In this loop I want 'i' to set the size. The index of small_lists
> starts at 0 but the size is the size of the blocks. This might make
> more sense like:
>
> for (uint i = _small_block_min_size; i < _small_block_max_size; i++) {
> int k = i - _small_block_min_size; // zero based addressing
> _small_lists[k].set_size(i);
> }
>
> Or something but the loops seem simple enough to me.
>
> Coleen
>>
>> -Dmitry
>>
>> On 2016-09-30 22:02, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>>> Summary: Return Metablocks smaller than dictionary's dark matter.
>>>
>>> This change contributed by Jon Masamitsu and myself. To reclaim "dark
>>> matter" this change adds an array of small blocks by size, created
>>> lazily, to return Metablocks smaller than the BinaryTreeDictionary
>>> entry's minimum size. This change also fixed a bug in small object
>>> double free and adds debugging code to check for this case.
>>>
>>> With this change, the submitted test case runs indefinitely. Also
>>> passed rbt tier 1-5 testing.
>>>
>>> open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/8164921.01/webrev
>>> bug link https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164921
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Coleen and Jon
>>
>
--
Dmitry Samersoff
Oracle Java development team, Saint Petersburg, Russia
* I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the sources.
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list