RFR(XS): 8168086: 8166869 broke jvmci build on aarch64

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

So this is an AARCH64 specific change and I'm good with this change
going in, but I'm not Jesper.

I've re-read Jesper's internal email about allowing urgent changes
to be pushed and it certainly sounds like he wants to approve the
urgent changes on a case-by-case basis.

I recommend waiting until you hear from Jesper, but that's just
my opinion.

Dan


On 10/17/16 10:34 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Changes does not affect code which we test. But RH can't build their 
> aarch64 port - they need to resolve it ASAP. Jesper said that we can 
> push urgent changes.
>
> Vladimir
>
> On 10/17/16 9:30 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Jesper (as the JDK9-hs GK) needs to agree to this push since
>> JDK9-hs is currently closed.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On 10/17/16 10:16 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>> Looks good.
>>>
>>> Please, push it into jdk9/hs since hs-comp is closed and RO from now 
>>> on.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>> On 10/17/16 8:58 AM, Roland Westrelin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 8166869 was missing a similar aarch64 change which, I suppose, is
>>>> something like this:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~roland/8168086/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> Roland.
>>>>
>>