[10] RFR for 'JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp'
Shafi Ahmad
shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com
Thu Apr 27 04:27:34 UTC 2017
Thank you David.
Regards,
Shafi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Holmes
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 2:20 AM
> To: Shafi Ahmad <shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com>; hotspot-
> dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: [10] RFR for 'JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in
> vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp'
>
> On 26/04/2017 10:44 PM, Shafi Ahmad wrote:
> > Thank you David and Kevin.
> >
> > Other possible change may be like -
> >
> > diff -r 762465099d93
> src/os_cpu/solaris_sparc/vm/vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp
> > --- a/src/os_cpu/solaris_sparc/vm/vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp Sat
> Apr 22 00:21:28 2017 +0000
> > +++ b/src/os_cpu/solaris_sparc/vm/vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp Sun
> Apr 23 23:49:42 2017 -0700
> > @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@
> > // is available to us as well
> > Sysinfo cpu_info(SI_CPUBRAND);
> > bool use_solaris_12_api = cpu_info.valid();
> > - const char* impl;
> > + const char* impl = "Unknown";
> > int impl_m = 0;
> > if (use_solaris_12_api) {
> > impl = cpu_info.value();
> > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@
> > kstat_close(kc);
> > }
> > }
> > - assert(impl_m != 0, "Unknown CPU implementation %s", impl);
> > + assert(impl_m != 0, "%s CPU implementation", impl);
>
> I would change to:
>
> assert(impl_m != 0, "Unrecognized CPU implementation: %s", impl);
>
> That assertion is checking the recognition of the impl string, not whether we
> obtained an impl string in the first place.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> > features |= impl_m;
> >
> > bool is_sun4v = (features & sun4v_m) != 0;
> >
> > After the above change we will lose the old message format.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Shafi
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: David Holmes
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 6:04 PM
> >> To: Shafi Ahmad <shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com>; hotspot-
> >> dev at openjdk.java.net
> >> Subject: Re: [10] RFR for 'JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char*
> >> in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp'
> >>
> >> Hi Shafi,
> >>
> >> On 26/04/2017 6:23 PM, Shafi Ahmad wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Please review the one line trivial change for the fix of bug 'JDK-8177958:
> >> Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp'
> >>>
> >>> Summary:
> >>> I have initialized the uninitialized variable 'imp' with "unknown"
> >>> as CPU
> >> implementation .
> >>
> >> That fixes the immediate problem - thanks.
> >>
> >> However the basic problem that kstat failures go unreported/logged
> persists.
> >> If the assert is triggered all we will see is "Unknown CPU
> >> implementation unknown" - which is not very enlightening. Perhaps a
> future enhancement ...
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >>> jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177958
> >>> webrev link:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8177958/webrev.00/
> >>>
> >>> Testing: run jprt
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Shafi
> >>>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list