RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813

[Zhengyu Gu]

Hi,

This 8u backport of JDK-8181005 has been reviewed by Aleksey [1] and 
approved by Rob [2].

However, it is not clear to me that the only reviewer has to be 
'R'eviewer. If so, can someone with 'R' to review the backport? It is 
almost the same as JDK9, with very minor conflicts.

I will also need sponsor this backport.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181055
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/


[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-June/027104.html
[2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-June/006723.html

Thanks,

-Zhengyu


On 06/09/2017 11:39 AM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>
>
> On 06/09/2017 10:04 AM, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>> Hi Zhengyu, Dan
>>
>> On 07-06-2017 17:37, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>> Thanks for the clarification, Dan.
>>>
>>> -Zhengyu
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/07/2017 04:14 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>>> hotspot-dev at ... is the right place for the RFR (which this is).
>>>>
>>>> jdk8u-dev at ... is the right place for the RFA (Request For Approval)
>>>> after the RFR is approved.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>
>> Does it mean that besides Aleksey's review it's still missing one
>> additional
>> review in order to proceed with the request for approval in the
>> jdk8u-dev ML
>> or this bug? Is my understanding correct?
>>
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> If backport has the same review process, then it needs a "R"eviwer.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Zhengyu
>
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gustavo
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/7/17 12:16 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>>>> Hi Aleksey,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the review.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/07/2017 02:11 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/07/2017 08:07 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181055
>>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks almost the same as 9. Looks good to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shouldn't you do this at jdk8-dev?
>>>>>>
>>>>> There is not jdk8-dev and jdk8 is read-only. I think jdk8u-dev is
>>>>> right one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> -Zhengyu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -Aleksey
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>