RFR (L but tedious) 8183039: Re-examine methodHandle methods uninlined by 8144256
harold seigel
harold.seigel at oracle.com
Thu Jul 27 14:16:13 UTC 2017
Hi Coleen,
The changes look good!
One small nit, in rewriter.cpp, Rewriter::rewrite_jsrs(), could this:
+ methodHandle new_method = method;
+ new_method = romc.do_potential_rewrite(CHECK_(methodHandle()));
just be:
+ methodHandle new_method =
romc.do_potential_rewrite(CHECK_(methodHandle()));
No need for a new webrev.
Thanks, Harold
On 7/27/2017 9:19 AM, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
> Summary: Add more const references so out-of-line methodHandle
> destructor and copy ctor called infrequently
>
> See RFE for more details. In short, use const methodHandle& when
> possible.
>
> open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/8183039.01/webrev
> bug link https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8183039
>
> Tested with RBT on linux, solaris and windows (still running) with
> tier2 testing and all tier1-5 tests on linux x64.
>
> Thanks,
> Coleen
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list