RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813

[Gustavo Romero]

Hi Dan,

On 09-06-2017 12:18, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> On 6/9/17 8:04 AM, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>> Hi Zhengyu, Dan
>>
>> On 07-06-2017 17:37, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>> Thanks for the clarification, Dan.
>>>
>>> -Zhengyu
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/07/2017 04:14 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>>> hotspot-dev at ... is the right place for the RFR (which this is).
>>>>
>>>> jdk8u-dev at ... is the right place for the RFA (Request For Approval)
>>>> after the RFR is approved.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>> Does it mean that besides Aleksey's review it's still missing one additional
>> review in order to proceed with the request for approval in the jdk8u-dev ML
>> or this bug? Is my understanding correct?
> 
> I believe that for a backport that is almost identical to the
> original, all we require is a single reviewer, even in HotSpot.

I see now. Thanks for clarifying.

Regards,
Gustavo


> Dan
> 
> 
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gustavo
>>
>>
>>>> On 6/7/17 12:16 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>>>> Hi Aleksey,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the review.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/07/2017 02:11 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/07/2017 08:07 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181055
>>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/
>>>>>> Looks almost the same as 9. Looks good to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shouldn't you do this at jdk8-dev?
>>>>>>
>>>>> There is not jdk8-dev and jdk8 is read-only. I think jdk8u-dev is
>>>>> right one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> -Zhengyu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -Aleksey
>>>>>>
>>
>