RFR(XL): 8181917: Refactor UL LogStreams to avoid using resource area
Marcus Larsson
marcus.larsson at oracle.com
Thu Jun 22 13:33:17 UTC 2017
On 2017-06-21 18:16, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Marcus Larsson
> <marcus.larsson at oracle.com <mailto:marcus.larsson at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On 2017-06-21 09:29, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
> Hi Marcus,
>
> thank you for reviewing!
>
> New webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/all.webrev.01/webrev/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Estuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/all.webrev.01/webrev/>
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Estuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/all.webrev.01/webrev/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Estuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/all.webrev.01/webrev/>>
>
> Delta to last version:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/delta-all-00-to-01/webrev/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Estuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/delta-all-00-to-01/webrev/>
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Estuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/delta-all-00-to-01/webrev/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Estuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/delta-all-00-to-01/webrev/>>
>
> Changes:
>
> - classfile/loaderConstraints.cpp: as you suggested, I fixed
> up all cases of "superfluous LogStream usage" I found and
> converted them to direct LogTarget::print() calls.
>
> - classfile/sharedPathsMiscInfo.cpp: here I opted for removing
> any notion of UL from this method, instead I just hand in an
> outputStream*. Both the "is_enabled" check and the LogStream
> creation is now handed in the caller frame. I also added a
> trailing cr().
>
> - gc/cms/compactibleFreeListSpace.cpp: removed the superfluous
> ResourceMark
>
> - logging/logStream.hpp: enabled the private operator new()
> declarations to disable heap allocations for class LogStream.
> I also gave it a try, works fine, if you do new(), now you get
> a linker error.
>
> The rest of the changes is concerned with the removal of
> "LogStreamCHeap" which is not needed anymore. Note that I
> found some new instances of "unguarded printing" and I updated
> comments at JDK-8182466
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8182466
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8182466>> .
>
> Thanks & Regards, Thomas
>
>
> This looks great.
>
> One last thing just hit me: We should have a unit test to cover
> the allocation case for LogStream. Preferably one that forces it
> to grow twice (once from stackbuffer, and once from heap), to make
> sure we exercise that code.
>
>
> Good idea, especially since I had a bug in the line buffer handling :P
Aha! :)
>
> New Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/all.webrev.02/webrev/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Estuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/all.webrev.02/webrev/>
>
> Delta to last:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/delta-01-to-02/webrev/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Estuefe/webrevs/8181917-refactor-ul-logstream/delta-01-to-02/webrev/>
Looks good to me.
Thanks,
Marcus
>
> Changes: fixed a bug where, on buffer resize in LogStream, the new
> buffer size was calculated wrong. Added a test to test LogStream resizing.
>
> I ran the gtests on win-x64 and linux-x64, and the jtreg
> servicability/logging tests on linux-x64. All good. I am currently
> running the whole hotspot jtreg tests, but that will take a while.
>
> Kind Regards, Thomas
>
> Thanks,
> Marcus
>
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list