Zero broken again

[Andrew Haley]

On 15/11/17 13:50, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Anyone else already noticed that Zero recently broke again?
> 
> I haven't filed a bug report yet as I just discovered it.
> 
> === Output from failing command(s) repeated here ===
> /usr/bin/printf "* For target hotspot_variant-zero_libjvm_objs_bytecodeInterpreter.o:\n"
> * For target hotspot_variant-zero_libjvm_objs_bytecodeInterpreter.o:
> (/bin/grep -v -e "^Note: including file:" <
> /usr/src/hs/build/linux-x86_64-normal-zero-release/make-support/failure-logs/hotspot_variant-zero_libjvm_objs_bytecodeInterpreter.o.log || true) | /usr/bin/head
> -n 12
> /usr/src/hs/src/hotspot/share/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp: In static member function ‘static void BytecodeInterpreter::run(interpreterState)’:
> /usr/src/hs/src/hotspot/share/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:107:51: error: ‘static void SafepointSynchronize::block(JavaThread*)’ is private within this

I'm looking at the JDK source, and SafepointSynchronize::block(JavaThread*)
is public.

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671