RFR: 8191333: Zero variant broken after 8189941

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

On 11/16/2017 10:12 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Add to that, that most basic tests usually expect a client/server JVM
> for which Zero is an odd ball. Also, due to it's weaker performance
> many tests time out and fail rather than conditionally setting longer
> timeout values. It's a rather large and cumbersome process to make the
> whole test suite Zero compatible.

Thanks for the explanation!

> It's more of a case of going through every test one by one and figuring
> out whether a "failure" is a test issue, a Zero issue, or an
> environmental issue.

So, after all the helpful input from everyone, I have modified my change
to kill the handles unconditionally as previously suggested [1].

I would like to have the change applied as in [1] if everyone agrees and
if I run into future issues with Zero, I will report them here anyway.

Thanks for all the input!

Adrian

> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~glaubitz/8191333/webrev.01/

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz at debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913