Any new ideas on JDK-8187338 (Per anonymous class class loader data is costly)?

[Andrew Haley]

On 23/11/17 16:50, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> I have already reviewed this patch privately and found it to be ok. I'll
> leave Zhengyu to reply as to whether he thinks it is ready to push to
> jdk10 and/or down to jdk8.

Whatever happens, it needs to be made public in some form.

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671