zero debug still broken after 8189871
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de
Fri Nov 24 17:26:02 UTC 2017
That’s odd. I just built Zero successfully a few hours ago after „hg pull && hg update —clean“.
If there had been an issue, I would have run into it.
Will try to test in an hour, currently on mobile.
Adrian
> On Nov 24, 2017, at 6:21 PM, Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> seems that "8191663: Zero variant broken after 8189170 and 8189871" was alone not sufficient to fix zero debug.
>
> When building zero (fast|slow)debug, I get this error:
>
> ---
> In file included from /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/specialized_oop_closures.hpp:28:0,
> from /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/objArrayOop.cpp:26:
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/access.inline.hpp: In instantiation of ‘void AccessInternal::verify_types() [with long unsigned int decorators = 2048ul; T = volatile oop]’:
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/access.inline.hpp:905:32: required from ‘T AccessInternal::load(P*) [with long unsigned int decorators = 2048ul; P = volatile oop; T = volatile oop]’
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/access.hpp:450:50: required from ‘static P Access<decorators>::load(P*) [with P = volatile oop; long unsigned int decorators = 2048ul]’
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/accessBackend.inline.hpp:247:34: required from ‘static typename EnableIf<AccessInternal::PossiblyLockedAccess<T>::value, T>::type RawAccessBarrier<decorators>::atomic_cmpxchg_maybe_locked(T, void*, T) [with long unsigned int ds = 1030ul; T = oop; long unsigned int decorators = 1030ul; typename EnableIf<AccessInternal::PossiblyLockedAccess<T>::value, T>::type = oop]’
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/accessBackend.hpp:325:51: required from ‘static T RawAccessBarrier<decorators>::atomic_cmpxchg(T, void*, T) [with T = oop; long unsigned int decorators = 1030ul]’
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/access.inline.hpp:619:37: required from ‘static typename EnableIf<HasDecorator<decorators, 2048ul>::value, T>::type AccessInternal::PreRuntimeDispatch::atomic_cmpxchg(T, void*, T) [with long unsigned int decorators = 289798ul; T = oop; typename EnableIf<HasDecorator<decorators, 2048ul>::value, T>::type = oop]’
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/access.inline.hpp:637:71: required from ‘static typename EnableIf<(! HasDecorator<decorators, 2048ul>::value), T>::type AccessInternal::PreRuntimeDispatch::atomic_cmpxchg(T, void*, T) [with long unsigned int decorators = 287750ul; T = oop; typename EnableIf<(! HasDecorator<decorators, 2048ul>::value), T>::type = oop]’
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/access.inline.hpp:821:67: required from ‘oop AccessInternal::atomic_cmpxchg_reduce_types(oop, HeapWord*, oop) [with long unsigned int decorators = 287748ul]’
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/access.inline.hpp:942:60: required from ‘T AccessInternal::atomic_cmpxchg(T, P*, T) [with long unsigned int decorators = 262148ul; P = volatile HeapWord; T = oop]’
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/access.hpp:492:78: required from ‘static T Access<decorators>::oop_atomic_cmpxchg(T, P*, T) [with P = volatile HeapWord; T = oop; long unsigned int decorators = 262144ul]’
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/objArrayOop.cpp:40:78: required from here
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/utilities/debug.hpp:184:29: error: incomplete type ‘STATIC_ASSERT_FAILURE<false>’ used in nested name specifier
> typedef char PASTE_TOKENS(STATIC_ASSERT_DUMMY_TYPE_, __LINE__)[ \
> ^
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/utilities/macros.hpp:47:33: note: in definition of macro ‘PASTE_TOKENS_AUX2’
> #define PASTE_TOKENS_AUX2(x, y) x ## y
> ^
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/utilities/macros.hpp:45:28: note: in expansion of macro ‘PASTE_TOKENS_AUX’
> #define PASTE_TOKENS(x, y) PASTE_TOKENS_AUX(x, y)
> ^
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/utilities/debug.hpp:184:16: note: in expansion of macro ‘PASTE_TOKENS’
> typedef char PASTE_TOKENS(STATIC_ASSERT_DUMMY_TYPE_, __LINE__)[ \
> ^
> /shared/projects/openjdk/jdk-hs/source/src/hotspot/share/oops/access.inline.hpp:873:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘STATIC_ASSERT’
> STATIC_ASSERT((HasDecorator<decorators, INTERNAL_VALUE_IS_OOP>::value || // oops have already been validated
> ^
> --
>
> with
>
> CONFIGURE_COMMAND_LINE:=--with-boot-jdk=/shared/projects/openjdk/jdks/openjdk9 --with-debug-level=fastdebug --with-jvm-variants=zero --with-native-debug-symbols=internal --disable-precompiled-headers --with-build-jdk=../output-release/images/jdk
>
> on Ubuntu 16.4. x64
>
> The error also happens in slow and fastdebug, with precompiled headers enabled or not. Release is fine (in a fashion, I need disable-warnings-as-errors to get it built, but I guess that is another bug).
>
> Thanks, ThomasIt seems triggered by "8189871: Refactor GC barriers to use declarative semantics", but I stared at this error message for half an hour now with not much progress... I do not really understand why the STATIC_ASSERT is failing here. Does anyone have an idea?
>
>
> Thanks, Thomas
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list