RFR (S): 8201326: Renaming ThreadLocalAllocationBuffer end to fast_path_end

[dean.long at oracle.com]

On 4/16/18 4:42 PM, JC Beyler wrote:
> If I read your answer correctly:
>    - You are saying that we should keep the _end field altogether; or 
> at least only rename the field not the methods to access it, thus 
> reducing the change scope.
>      - You are also saying to wait for the JEP-331 webrev's final 
> iteration and integrate it in one step

Yes, my suggestion is to not rename access methods now, and try to avoid 
it in the future.  I'm OK with renaming the field(s), but I don't have a 
strong opinion on what the new names should be.

dl