[PATCH][TESTBUG] JDK-8214052: Wrong shell used
Sergey
merkel05 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 8 03:24:31 UTC 2018
Hi Jesper,
I’ve double checked with “test”s man page
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/test.1.html
In particular this part:
STRING1 != STRING2
the strings are not equal
INTEGER1 *-ne *INTEGER2
INTEGER1 is not equal to INTEGER2
and applied those respectively.
Do you think I better use “!=” in both places?
Regards,
Sergei
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 04:10, <jesper.wilhelmsson at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why do you replace != with -ne in one case and not in the other?
>
> Thanks,
> /Jesper
>
> > On 8 Dec 2018, at 02:19, Sergey <merkel05 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Could anyone please review that tiny fix for test script below?
> > That would be extremely great if anyone could sponsor the change as well.
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Sergei
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, 08:37 Sergey <merkel05 at gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've posted the original mail to the wrong mailing list and thanks to
> >> David for guidance.
> >>
> >> Problem goes as follows: as stated in the bug description [1] there are
> few
> >> places in the tests where extended bash syntax is being used.
> >>
> >> First one is (as per ticket in the headline):
> >>
> >> - vmTestbase/vm/compiler/CodeCacheInfoOnCompilation
> >>
> >> I've made a quick fix for that one and patch could be found
> >> inlined below.
> >>
> >> Moreover what I've noticed is that grep gives me
> >> another test script:
> >>
> >> - GeneratePropertyPassword.sh [2]
> >>
> >> that seems to be linked with another ticket [3] which is closed,
> >> though it still uses the bash "[[" extension. Perhaps this [4] fix
> >> needs to be reapplied.
> >>
> >> In regards to the patch below, please let me know if I've missed
> >> something. Changes were successfully tested with `dash v0.5.10.2-1`.
> >>
> >> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214052
> >> [2]
> >>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/sandbox/file/413c28945e0f/test/jdk/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/GeneratePropertyPassword.sh#l37
> >> [3] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025886
> >> [4] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/a2551e12a9ea0.5.10.2-1
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> su -
> >>
> >> diff --git
> >>
> a/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/vm/compiler/CodeCacheInfoOnCompilation/run.sh
> >>
> b/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/vm/compiler/CodeCacheInfoOnCompilation/run.sh
> >> ---
> >>
> a/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/vm/compiler/CodeCacheInfoOnCompilation/run.sh
> >> +++
> >>
> b/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/vm/compiler/CodeCacheInfoOnCompilation/run.sh
> >> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> >>
> >> ver=$(${TESTED_JAVA_HOME}/bin/java ${JAVA_OPTS} -version 2>&1)
> >> isComp=$( echo ${ver} | grep -c "compiled mode")
> >> -if [[ $isComp != 1 ]]; then
> >> +if [ "$isComp" -ne 1 ]; then
> >> echo "skipped. This test works only with -Xcomp"
> >> exit
> >> fi
> >> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
> >> res=$(${TESTED_JAVA_HOME}/bin/java ${JAVA_OPTS}
> >> -XX:+PrintCodeCacheOnCompilation -XX:-Inline
> >> vm.compiler.CodeCacheInfoOnCompilation.PrintOnCall | egrep -ce
> "${pattern}")
> >> echo "res: " ${res}
> >>
> >> -if (( "${res}" != "0" )); then
> >> +if [ "$res" != "0" ]; then
> >> echo "passed"
> >> true
> >> else
> >>
>
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list