RFR: 8202989: Add missing decorators in calls to to arraycopy_prologue/epilogue

[Stefan Karlsson]

Looks good.

StefanK

On 2018-05-11 10:47, Per Liden wrote:
> Calls to BarrierSetAssambler::arraycopy_prologue/epilogue() are missing 
> the IN_HEAP and IN_HEAP_ARRAY access decorators. This is sort of ok, 
> since the context (we're doing an arraycopy) imply these. However, by 
> not explicitly specifying them we loose the ability to do straight 
> forward checks/asserts on expected/allowed decorators later on in the GC 
> specific BarrierSetAssermbler backends. To avoid having the backends 
> know about this implicit relationship I propose that we explicitly 
> specify them at the call-sites.
> 
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202989
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pliden/8202989/webrev.0
> Testing: hs-tier{1,2}
> 
> /Per