[hs] RFR (L): 8010319: Implementation of JEP 181: Nest-Based Access Control
Aleksey Shipilev
shade at redhat.com
Tue May 22 22:50:26 UTC 2018
On 05/22/2018 11:44 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> On 23/05/2018 2:35 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 05/22/2018 06:01 PM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
>>>> aarch64: FAILED
>>>> java/lang/invoke/SpecialInterfaceCall.java
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/nestmates/SpecialInterfaceCall-hs_err.log
>>>>
>>>> I have not dug deeper yet, AArch64 maintainers are welcome to step in!
>>> I'm not sure what is going on here.
>>>
>>> A few days ago I patched the jdk/jdk dev tree with David's megapatch,
>>> built on AArch64 and ran tier1 tests, obtaining results before and after
>>> patching. There were some tier1 test failures which did not seem to
>>> relate to the NestMates patch. All three of CondyReturnPrimitiveTest,
>>> CondyWrongType and SpecialInterfaceCall passed before and after.
>>>
>>> I will check to see the patch has been applied correctly and rerun these
>>> tests. Aleksey, perhaps you could try again using a patched jdkdev?
>>
>> Applied David's webrev.hotspot.v1 over current jdk/jdk, and SpecialInterfaceCall fails the same way
>> with linux-aarch64-fastdebug on my Raspberry Pi 3.
>
> You can't just apply the hotspot patch! You need the entire thing.
Duh, right. In this case, we were "saved" by the fact the failing test seems to explore hotspot side
of things only, and it fails the same way the nestmates branch in valhalla repo. And anyhow,
applying the full patch fails the same way :)
-Aleksey
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list