[PATCH] JDK NUMA Interleaving issue
amith pawar
amith.pawar at gmail.com
Tue Nov 13 13:34:39 UTC 2018
Hi David,
I am from AMD and OCA processing is done. OK now ?
Thanks
Amit
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 6:07 AM David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>
wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> On 10/11/2018 10:34 AM, amith pawar wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > I have initiated for OCA processing and working as an individual
> > contributor.
>
> Great! Welcome to OpenJDK. Please advise once your OCA is processed and
> then we can properly look at your contribution.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> > Thanks,
> > Amit Pawar
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2018, 4:03 AM David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com
> > <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Amith,
> >
> > I do not see you listed as a Contributor on the OCA list [1], nor
> can I
> > tell from your email address whether you work for a company that is a
> > signatory. Please confirm your status.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> >
> > [1] https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
> >
> > On 9/11/2018 10:23 PM, amith pawar wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
> > > The flag UseNUMA (or UseNUMAInterleaving), has to interleave old
> > gen, S1
> > > and S2 region (if any other ) memory areas
> > >
> > > on requested Numa nodes and it should not configure itself to
> > access other
> > > Numa nodes. This issue is observed only when Java
> > >
> > > is allowed to run on fewer NUMA nodes than available on the
> > system with
> > > numactl membind and interleave options. Running
> > >
> > > on all the nodes does not have any effect. This will cause some
> > > applications (objects residing in old gen and survivor region) to
> > >
> > > run slower on system with large Numa nodes.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have described below in more detail for both numactl MEMBIND and
> > > INTERLEAVE options. Addresses from both GC log and
> > >
> > > process numa maps clearly shows that the JAVA process is
> > configured to
> > > access other memory nodes even though it is not allowed.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Two scenarios are:
> > >
> > > 1. Numactl membind case : numactl -m 0-1, -N 0-1
> > <command and its
> > > arguments>
> > >
> > >
> > > Numa map shows these regions are INTERLEAVED ON ALL NODES instead
> of
> > > specified Numa memory nodes 0 and 1.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------- GC
> > >
> >
> HEAP--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > GC Options: -Xlog:gc*=info,gc+heap=debug
> > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > [602.180s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(20) Heap before GC
> > invocations=21
> > > (full 4): PSYoungGen total 120604672K, used 11907587K
> > > [0x00002afc4b200000, 0x00002b198b200000, 0x00002b198b200000)
> > >
> > > [602.180s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(20) eden space
> > 118525952K, 8% used
> > > [0x00002afc4b200000,0x00002b0bb1b376e0,0x00002b188d600000)
> > >
> > > [602.180s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(20) lgrp 0 space
> > 59262976K, 8%
> > > used [0x00002afc4b200000,0x00002afd89bef450,0x00002b0a6c400000)
> > >
> > > [602.180s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(20) lgrp 1 space
> > 59262976K, 8%
> > > used [0x00002b0a6c400000,0x00002b0bb1b376e0,0x00002b188d600000)
> > >
> > > [602.180s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(20) from space 2078720K,
> > 65% used
> > > [0x00002b190c400000,0x00002b195ef5a0d0,0x00002b198b200000)
> > >
> > > [602.180s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(20) to space 2078720K,
> > 0% used
> > > [0x00002b188d600000,0x00002b188d600000,0x00002b190c400000)
> > >
> > > [602.180s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(20) ParOldGen total
> > 2097152K,
> > > used 226685K [0x00002afbcb200000, 0x00002afc4b200000,
> > 0x00002afc4b200000)
> > >
> > > [602.180s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(20) object space
> > 2097152K, 10% used
> > > [0x00002afbcb200000,0x00002afbd8f5f460,0x00002afc4b200000)
> > >
> > > [602.180s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(20) Metaspace used
> > 28462K,
> > > capacity 29008K, committed 29184K, reserved 30720K
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------- GC HEAP
> > >
> >
> END--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------- PROCESS NUMA Maps
> > >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Command : cat /proc/4947/numa_maps
> > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > =======> Following addresses are interleaved on all nodes.
> > >
> > > 2afbb4f4c000 interleave:0-7 anon=16 dirty=16 N0=2 N1=2 N2=2 N3=2
> > N4=2 N5=2
> > > N6=2 N7=2 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2afbb4f6c000 interleave:0-7
> > >
> > > 2afbb7e88000 interleave:0-7 anon=50 dirty=50 N0=7 N1=7 N2=6 N3=6
> > N4=6 N5=6
> > > N6=6 N7=6 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2afbbc000000 interleave:0-7 anon=8704 dirty=8704 N0=1600 N1=1088
> > N2=1088
> > > N3=576 N4=1088 N5=1088 N6=1088 N7=1088 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2afbc3be6000 interleave:0-7 anon=6682 dirty=6682 N0=1027 N1=1027
> > N2=515
> > > N3=515 N4=515 N5=1027 N6=1028 N7=1028 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2afbcb000000 interleave:0-7 anon=50 dirty=50 N0=7 N1=7 N2=6 N3=6
> > N4=6 N5=6
> > > N6=6 N7=6 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2afbcb200000 interleave:0-7 anon=524288 dirty=524288 N0=65536
> > N1=65536
> > > N2=65536 N3=65536 N4=65536 N5=65536 N6=65536 N7=65536
> > kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > ==> OLD GEN Address
> > >
> > > 2afc4b200000 prefer:0 anon=1536 dirty=1536 N0=1536
> > kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2b0a6c400000 prefer:1 anon=512 dirty=512 N1=512
> kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2b188d600000 interleave:0-7 anon=1040384 dirty=1040384 N0=130048
> > N1=130048
> > > N2=130048 N3=130048 N4=130048 N5=130048 N6=130048 N7=130048
> > > kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > ==> Survivor Region
> > >
> > > 2b198b600000 interleave:0-7 anon=60929 dirty=60929 N0=7233
> > N1=7744 N2=7232
> > > N3=7744 N4=7744 N5=7744 N6=7744 N7=7744 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------- PROCESS NUMA Maps
> > >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------- PROCESS status
> > >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Command : cat /proc/4947/status
> > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Cpus_allowed: 00000000,0000ffff,00000000,0000ffff
> > >
> > > Cpus_allowed_list: 0-15,64-79
> > >
> > > Mems_allowed:
> > >
> >
> 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,000000ff
> > >
> > > Mems_allowed_list: 0-7
> > >
> > > --------------------------------- PROCESS status
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2. NUMACTL Interleave case: numactl -i 0-1, -N 0-1
> > <command and
> > > its arguments>
> > >
> > >
> > > NUMAmaps below shows interleaved on all nodes instead of
> > specified Numa
> > > memory nodes 0 and 1.
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------- GC
> > >
> >
> HEAP--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > GC Options: -Xlog:gc*=info,gc+heap=debug
> > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) Heap before GC
> > invocations=160
> > > (full 9): PSYoungGen total 120604672K, used 30143454K
> > > [0x00002b9d47c00000, 0x00002bba87c00000, 0x00002bba87c00000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) eden space
> > 118525952K, 24%
> > > used [0x00002b9d47c00000,0x00002ba458400000,0x00002bb98a000000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) lgrp 0 space
> > 14815232K, 98%
> > > used [0x00002b9d47c00000,0x00002ba0beb87c90,0x00002ba0d0000000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) lgrp 1 space
> > 14815232K,
> > > 100% used
> [0x00002ba0d0000000,0x00002ba458400000,0x00002ba458400000)
> > >
> > > ==> Memory allocated on following nodes are unused.
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) lgrp 2 space
> > 14815232K, 0%
> > > used [0x00002ba458400000,0x00002ba458400000,0x00002ba7e0800000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) lgrp 3 space
> > 14815232K, 0%
> > > used [0x00002ba7e0800000,0x00002ba7e0800000,0x00002bab68c00000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) lgrp 4 space
> > 14815232K, 0%
> > > used [0x00002bab68c00000,0x00002bab68c00000,0x00002baef1000000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) lgrp 5 space
> > 14815232K, 0%
> > > used [0x00002baef1000000,0x00002baef1000000,0x00002bb279400000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) lgrp 6 space
> > 14815232K, 0%
> > > used [0x00002bb279400000,0x00002bb279400000,0x00002bb601800000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) lgrp 7 space
> > 14819328K, 0%
> > > used [0x00002bb601800000,0x00002bb601800000,0x00002bb98a000000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) from space
> > 2078720K, 38% used
> > > [0x00002bba08e00000,0x00002bba3976fb70,0x00002bba87c00000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) to space
> > 2078720K, 0% used
> > > [0x00002bb98a000000,0x00002bb98a000000,0x00002bba08e00000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) ParOldGen total
> > > 2097152K, used 685229K [0x00002b9cc7c00000, 0x00002b9d47c00000,
> > > 0x00002b9d47c00000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) object space
> > 2097152K, 32%
> > > used [0x00002b9cc7c00000,0x00002b9cf192b6e8,0x00002b9d47c00000)
> > >
> > > [2216.439s][debug][gc,heap ] GC(159) Metaspace used
> > 28753K,
> > > capacity 29257K, committed 29440K, reserved 30720K
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------- GC HEAP
> > >
> >
> END-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------- PROCESS NUMA Maps
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Command : cat /proc/pid/numa_maps
> > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > ==> Following addresses are interleaved on all the nodes.
> > >
> > > 2b9cb1992000 interleave:0-7 anon=16 dirty=16 N0=2 N1=2 N2=2 N3=2
> > N4=2 N5=2
> > > N6=2 N7=2 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2b9cb19b2000 interleave:0-7
> > >
> > > 2b9cb3e65000 interleave:0-7 anon=50 dirty=50 N0=6 N1=6 N2=6 N3=6
> > N4=6 N5=7
> > > N6=7 N7=6 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2b9cb8a69000 interleave:0-7 anon=8599 dirty=8599 N0=626 N1=1139
> > N2=1139
> > > N3=1139 N4=1139 N5=1139 N6=1139 N7=1139 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2b9cc064f000 interleave:0-7 anon=6577 dirty=6577 N0=566 N1=566
> N2=566
> > > N3=1078 N4=1078 N5=1078 N6=1078 N7=567 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2b9cc7a69000 interleave:0-7 anon=50 dirty=50 N0=6 N1=7 N2=7 N3=6
> > N4=6 N5=6
> > > N6=6 N7=6 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2b9cc7c00000 interleave:0-7 anon=524288 dirty=524288 N0=65536
> > N1=65536
> > > N2=65536 N3=65536 N4=65536 N5=65536 N6=65536 N7=65536
> > kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2b9d47c00000 prefer:0 anon=2560 dirty=2560 N0=2560
> > kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > > ==> Logical group 1
> > >
> > > 2ba0d0000000
> > > prefer:1
> > > ==> Logical group 2
> > >
> > > 2ba458400000 prefer:2
> > >
> > > ==> This one and below all are unnecessary and leaving memory
> unused.
> > >
> > > 2ba7e0800000 prefer:3
> > >
> > > 2bab68c00000 prefer:4
> > >
> > > 2baef1000000 prefer:5
> > >
> > > 2bb279400000 prefer:6
> > >
> > > 2bb601800000 prefer:7
> > >
> > > 2bb98a000000 interleave:0-7 anon=1040384 dirty=1040384 N0=130048
> > N1=130048
> > > N2=130048 N3=130048 N4=130048 N5=130048 N6=130048 N7=130048
> > > kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > 2bba88000000 interleave:0-7 anon=60929 dirty=60929 N0=7745
> > N1=7744 N2=7744
> > > N3=7744 N4=7744 N5=7232 N6=7744 N7=7232 kernelpagesize_kB=4
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------- PROCESS NUMA Maps
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------- PROCESS status
> > >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Command : cat /proc/pid/status
> > >
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Cpus_allowed: 00000000,0000ffff,00000000,0000ffff
> > >
> > > Cpus_allowed_list: 0-15,64-79
> > >
> > > Mems_allowed:
> > >
> >
> 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,000000ff
> > >
> > > Mems_allowed_list: 0-7
> > >
> > > --------------------------------- PROCESS status
> > >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please note “Mems_allowed” and “Mems_allowed_list” list also shows
> > > incorrect range. This could be LIBNUMA issue in case of membind.
> > >
> > > When application is externally bound to fewer nodes then calls to
> > libNUMA
> > > API’s SHOULD FAIL to interleave on all nodes but right now it
> > >
> > > does not with currently used/called API’s in JDK.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > How patch works ?
> > >
> > > The patch gets bitmask structure by calling following API's (Man
> page
> > > definition for these functions are also given below).
> > >
> > > 1. For Membind : Use numa_get_membind to get membind bitmask
> > (already used
> > > in the code)
> > >
> > >
> > > numa_get_membind() returns the mask of nodes from which
> > memory can
> > > currently be allocated. If the returned mask is equal to
> > numa_all_nodes,
> > > then memory allocation is allowed from all nodes.
> > >
> > > 2. For Interleave: use numa_get_interleave_mask to get
> > interleave mask
> > > (currently not used/called in JDK)
> > > numa_get_interleave_mask() returns the current interleave
> > mask if the
> > > task's memory allocation policy is page interleaved. Otherwise,
> this
> > > function returns an empty mask.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Check node counts from both the Bitmasks to identify current
> > running mode.
> > > When Interleave mask is EMPTY then it is running in membind else
> > it is in
> > > interleave mode.
> > >
> > > Call “numa_interleave_memory” (called indirectly through
> > “numa_make_global”
> > > funcition) function with right bitmask identified above helps to
> > fix this
> > > issue.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Improvement:
> > >
> > > This patch is tested on EPYC with SPECJBB benchmark and score
> > improvements
> > > are given below.
> > >
> > > 1. For NUMACTL membind
> > >
> > > Max-jOPS improved by 5-12 % and Critical-jOPS by 2-6 %
> > >
> > > 2. For NUMACTL interleave (This patch fixes memory usage when
> > invoked with
> > > numactl -i)
> > >
> > > Max-jOPS by 5-15% and Critical-jOPS by 11-100%.
> > >
> > > 3. With this fix, flag UseNUMAInterleaving turning on/off has no
> > effect
> > > when externally interleaved through NUMACTL.
> > >
> > > 4. Flag UseNUMA score improved by ~14 % when enabled for single
> > NUMA node.
> > > Currently it gets disabled when externally bound to single node.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------- PATCH --------------------------
> > > diff --git a/src/hotspot/os/linux/os_linux.cpp
> > > b/src/hotspot/os/linux/os_linux.cpp
> > > --- a/src/hotspot/os/linux/os_linux.cpp
> > > +++ b/src/hotspot/os/linux/os_linux.cpp
> > > @@ -2720,6 +2720,8 @@
> > > }
> > >
> > > void os::numa_make_global(char *addr, size_t bytes) {
> > > + if (!UseNUMAInterleaving)
> > > + return ;
> > > Linux::numa_interleave_memory(addr, bytes);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -2785,6 +2787,15 @@
> > > ids[i++] = node;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > +
> > > + if (Linux::_numa_interleave_ptr != NULL ) {
> > > + i = 0;
> > > + for (int node = 0; node <= highest_node_number; node++) {
> > > + if
> (Linux::_numa_bitmask_isbitset(Linux::_numa_interleave_ptr,
> > > node)) {
> > > + ids[i++] = node;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > return i;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -2884,11 +2895,18 @@
> > > libnuma_dlsym(handle,
> > > "numa_distance")));
> > >
> set_numa_get_membind(CAST_TO_FN_PTR(numa_get_membind_func_t,
> > >
> libnuma_v2_dlsym(handle,
> > > "numa_get_membind")));
> > > +
> > >
> >
> set_numa_get_interleave_mask(CAST_TO_FN_PTR(numa_get_interleave_mask_func_t,
> > > +
> libnuma_v2_dlsym(handle,
> > > "numa_get_interleave_mask")));
> > >
> > > if (numa_available() != -1) {
> > > + struct bitmask *bmp;
> > > set_numa_all_nodes((unsigned long*)libnuma_dlsym(handle,
> > > "numa_all_nodes"));
> > > set_numa_all_nodes_ptr((struct bitmask
> > **)libnuma_dlsym(handle,
> > > "numa_all_nodes_ptr"));
> > > set_numa_nodes_ptr((struct bitmask
> **)libnuma_dlsym(handle,
> > > "numa_nodes_ptr"));
> > > + bmp = _numa_get_interleave_mask();
> > > + set_numa_interleave_ptr(&bmp);
> > > + bmp = _numa_get_membind();
> > > + set_numa_membind_ptr(&bmp);
> > > // Create an index -> node mapping, since nodes are not
> > always
> > > consecutive
> > > _nindex_to_node = new (ResourceObj::C_HEAP, mtInternal)
> > > GrowableArray<int>(0, true);
> > > rebuild_nindex_to_node_map();
> > > @@ -3015,9 +3033,12 @@
> > > os::Linux::numa_bitmask_isbitset_func_t
> > os::Linux::_numa_bitmask_isbitset;
> > > os::Linux::numa_distance_func_t os::Linux::_numa_distance;
> > > os::Linux::numa_get_membind_func_t os::Linux::_numa_get_membind;
> > > +os::Linux::numa_get_interleave_mask_func_t
> > > os::Linux::_numa_get_interleave_mask;
> > > unsigned long* os::Linux::_numa_all_nodes;
> > > struct bitmask* os::Linux::_numa_all_nodes_ptr;
> > > struct bitmask* os::Linux::_numa_nodes_ptr;
> > > +struct bitmask* os::Linux::_numa_interleave_ptr;
> > > +struct bitmask* os::Linux::_numa_membind_ptr;
> > >
> > > bool os::pd_uncommit_memory(char* addr, size_t size) {
> > > uintptr_t res = (uintptr_t) ::mmap(addr, size, PROT_NONE,
> > > @@ -4997,13 +5018,38 @@
> > > if (!Linux::libnuma_init()) {
> > > UseNUMA = false;
> > > } else {
> > > - if ((Linux::numa_max_node() < 1) ||
> > Linux::isbound_to_single_node())
> > > {
> > > - // If there's only one node (they start from 0) or if
> > the process
> > > - // is bound explicitly to a single node using membind,
> > disable
> > > NUMA.
> > > - UseNUMA = false;
> > > +
> > > + // Identify whether running in membind or interleave mode.
> > > + struct bitmask *bmp;
> > > + bool _is_membind = false;
> > > + bool _is_interleaved = false;
> > > +
> > > + // Check for membind mode.
> > > + bmp = Linux::_numa_membind_ptr;
> > > + for (int node = 0; node <= Linux::numa_max_node() ; node++) {
> > > + if (Linux::_numa_bitmask_isbitset(bmp, node)) {
> > > + _is_membind = true;
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > + // Check for interleave mode.
> > > + bmp = Linux::_numa_interleave_ptr;
> > > + for (int node = 0; node <= Linux::numa_max_node() ; node++) {
> > > + if (Linux::_numa_bitmask_isbitset(bmp, node)) {
> > > + _is_interleaved = true;
> > > + // Set membind to false as interleave mode allows all
> > nodes to be
> > > used.
> > > + _is_membind = false;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (_is_membind)
> > > + Linux::set_numa_interleave_ptr (NULL);
> > > +
> > > + if (_is_interleaved)
> > > + Linux::set_numa_membind_ptr (NULL);
> > > +
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (UseParallelGC && UseNUMA && UseLargePages &&
> > > !can_commit_large_page_memory()) {
> > > // With SHM and HugeTLBFS large pages we cannot uncommit
> > a page, so
> > > there's no way
> > > // we can make the adaptive lgrp chunk resizing work. If
> > the user
> > > specified both
> > > diff --git a/src/hotspot/os/linux/os_linux.hpp
> > > b/src/hotspot/os/linux/os_linux.hpp
> > > --- a/src/hotspot/os/linux/os_linux.hpp
> > > +++ b/src/hotspot/os/linux/os_linux.hpp
> > > @@ -222,6 +222,7 @@
> > > typedef void (*numa_interleave_memory_func_t)(void *start,
> > size_t size,
> > > unsigned long *nodemask);
> > > typedef void (*numa_interleave_memory_v2_func_t)(void *start,
> > size_t
> > > size, struct bitmask* mask);
> > > typedef struct bitmask* (*numa_get_membind_func_t)(void);
> > > + typedef struct bitmask*
> (*numa_get_interleave_mask_func_t)(void);
> > >
> > > typedef void (*numa_set_bind_policy_func_t)(int policy);
> > > typedef int (*numa_bitmask_isbitset_func_t)(struct bitmask
> *bmp,
> > > unsigned int n);
> > > @@ -239,9 +240,12 @@
> > > static numa_bitmask_isbitset_func_t _numa_bitmask_isbitset;
> > > static numa_distance_func_t _numa_distance;
> > > static numa_get_membind_func_t _numa_get_membind;
> > > + static numa_get_interleave_mask_func_t
> _numa_get_interleave_mask;
> > > static unsigned long* _numa_all_nodes;
> > > static struct bitmask* _numa_all_nodes_ptr;
> > > static struct bitmask* _numa_nodes_ptr;
> > > + static struct bitmask* _numa_interleave_ptr;
> > > + static struct bitmask* _numa_membind_ptr;
> > >
> > > static void set_sched_getcpu(sched_getcpu_func_t func) {
> > _sched_getcpu =
> > > func; }
> > > static void set_numa_node_to_cpus(numa_node_to_cpus_func_t
> > func) {
> > > _numa_node_to_cpus = func; }
> > > @@ -255,9 +259,12 @@
> > > static void
> > set_numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_bitmask_isbitset_func_t func)
> > > { _numa_bitmask_isbitset = func; }
> > > static void set_numa_distance(numa_distance_func_t func) {
> > > _numa_distance = func; }
> > > static void set_numa_get_membind(numa_get_membind_func_t
> func) {
> > > _numa_get_membind = func; }
> > > + static void
> > set_numa_get_interleave_mask(numa_get_interleave_mask_func_t
> > > func) { _numa_get_interleave_mask = func; }
> > > static void set_numa_all_nodes(unsigned long* ptr) {
> > _numa_all_nodes =
> > > ptr; }
> > > static void set_numa_all_nodes_ptr(struct bitmask **ptr) {
> > > _numa_all_nodes_ptr = (ptr == NULL ? NULL : *ptr); }
> > > static void set_numa_nodes_ptr(struct bitmask **ptr) {
> > _numa_nodes_ptr =
> > > (ptr == NULL ? NULL : *ptr); }
> > > + static void set_numa_interleave_ptr(struct bitmask **ptr) {
> > > _numa_interleave_ptr = (ptr == NULL ? NULL : *ptr); }
> > > + static void set_numa_membind_ptr(struct bitmask **ptr) {
> > > _numa_membind_ptr = (ptr == NULL ? NULL : *ptr); }
> > > static int sched_getcpu_syscall(void);
> > > public:
> > > static int sched_getcpu() { return _sched_getcpu != NULL ?
> > > _sched_getcpu() : -1; }
> > > @@ -275,7 +282,10 @@
> > > static void numa_interleave_memory(void *start, size_t size) {
> > > // Use v2 api if available
> > > if (_numa_interleave_memory_v2 != NULL &&
> > _numa_all_nodes_ptr != NULL)
> > > {
> > > - _numa_interleave_memory_v2(start, size,
> _numa_all_nodes_ptr);
> > > + if (_numa_interleave_ptr != NULL)
> > > + _numa_interleave_memory_v2(start, size,
> > _numa_interleave_ptr);
> > > + else
> > > + _numa_interleave_memory_v2(start, size,
> _numa_membind_ptr);
> > > } else if (_numa_interleave_memory != NULL &&
> > _numa_all_nodes != NULL)
> > > {
> > > _numa_interleave_memory(start, size, _numa_all_nodes);
> > > }
> > > ----------------------- PATCH -----------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Amit Pawar
> > >
> >
>
--
With best regards,
amit pawar
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list