RFR (S): 8228857: Refactor PlatformMonitor into PlatformMutex and PlatformMonitor
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Aug 6 03:00:33 UTC 2019
Thanks Dean!
David
On 6/08/2019 12:32 pm, dean.long at oracle.com wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> dl
>
> On 8/5/19 6:49 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> Ping!
>>
>> On 2/08/2019 9:03 am, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8228857
>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8228857/webrev/
>>>
>>> As suggested by Per Liden when PlatformMonitor was introduced by
>>> JDK-8210832 we should refactor PlatformMonitor into a simpler
>>> PlatformMutex extended by PlatformMonitor. That would potentially
>>> allow other synchronization objects e.g. Zlocks, to be replaced by a
>>> suitable PlatformX class, and allows us to redefine JVM_RawMonitor
>>> support to use it (forthcoming change).
>>>
>>> The refactoring would be obvious and simple if not for the macOS
>>> PThread allocation bug workaround. I had to change the Posix variant
>>> so that we only use the Impl helper class on macOS, so that we can
>>> separate the allocation of the pthread_mutex_t and pthread_cond_t.
>>> For macOS both get allocated in the PlatformMutex.
>>>
>>> There are not actual usage changes in this RFE.
>>>
>>> Testing: mach5 tiers 1-3
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> David
>>> -----
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list