RFR: 8229352: Use of an unitialized register in 32-bit ARM template interpreter

[christoph.goettschkes at microdoc.com]

Thanks for your feedback.

Here is a new webrev with the proposed change applied:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bulasevich/8229352/webrev.01/
I tested the new changes with a subset of the hotspot tier1 JTreg test 
group.

Does this look fine to you?

-- Christoph

"hotspot-dev" <hotspot-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> wrote on 2019-08-12 
20:53:46:

> From: Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com>
> To: dean.long at oracle.com, hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Date: 2019-08-12 20:54
> Subject: Re: RFR: 8229352: Use of an unitialized register in 32-bit ARM 
> template interpreter
> Sent by: "hotspot-dev" <hotspot-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net>
> 
> On 8/12/19 8:37 PM, dean.long at oracle.com wrote:
> > Looks OK, but after the Condy change, the label "Long" might be better 
named
> "NotDouble".
> 
> +1
> 
> > On 8/10/19 11:54 PM, christoph.goettschkes at microdoc.com wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> could someone please review the changes for
> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229352
> >>
> >> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bulasevich/8229352/webrev.00/
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Note: changed the typo in "uninitialized" in issue synopsis, please make 
sure 
> changeset metadata
> reflects that.
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> -Aleksey
>