RFR: JDK-8227021: VM fails if any sun.boot.library.path paths are longer than JVM_MAXPATHLEN

Adam Farley8 adam.farley at uk.ibm.com
Wed Aug 14 11:09:33 UTC 2019


Addendum: I've run the test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime tests against a patched 
and unpatched build on linux x86 64bit, and the pass/fail rate is 
identical.

630 passed, 7 failed, and 63 error in both cases.

Best Regards

Adam Farley 
IBM Runtimes


Adam Farley8/UK/IBM wrote on 13/08/2019 17:36:44:

> From: Adam Farley8/UK/IBM
> To: "serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com" <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>, 
> daniel.daugherty at oracle.com
> Cc: David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>, hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Date: 13/08/2019 17:36
> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227021: VM fails if any sun.boot.library.path
> paths are longer than JVM_MAXPATHLEN
> 
> Hi Serguei, Daniel,
> 
> I ran the bug specific test mentioned in the bug, as well as this: 
> test/hotspot/jtreg/sanity
> 
> No failures. Well, except for the one we wanted in the bug test. :)
> 
> On reflection, this seems thin, so I'm running some more hotspot tests 
now.
> 
> Advice welcome.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Adam Farley 
> IBM Runtimes

> 
> "serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com" <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com> wrote on 
> 13/08/2019 17:09:17:
> 
> > From: "serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com" <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>
> > To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>, David Holmes 
> > <david.holmes at oracle.com>
> > Cc: hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Date: 13/08/2019 17:20
> > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227021: VM fails if any sun.boot.library.path
> > paths are longer than JVM_MAXPATHLEN
> > 
> > Hi Adam,
> > 
> > Could you, please, tell a little bit on how did you test the fix?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Serguei
> > 
> > 
> > On 8/13/19 09:00, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> > 
> > I'll sponsor the push.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Serguei
> > 
> > 
> > On 8/13/19 08:48, Adam Farley8 wrote:
> > Hi David, 
> > 
> > Since we have two positive reviews (yours and Serguei's), could you 
> > sponsor the change please?
> > 
> > Best Regards
> > 
> > Adam Farley 
> > IBM Runtimes
> > 
> > 
> > David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote on 12/08/2019 23:32:14:
> > 
> > > From: David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> 
> > > To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com> 
> > > Cc: hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net, "serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com" 
> > > <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com> 
> > > Date: 12/08/2019 23:32 
> > > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227021: VM fails if any sun.boot.library.path
> > > paths are longer than JVM_MAXPATHLEN 
> > > 
> > > Looks fine.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > David
> > > 
> > > On 13/08/2019 1:19 am, Adam Farley8 wrote:
> > > > Hi David,
> > > > 
> > > > Changes made as requested: 
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
> > > u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Eafarley_8227021.4_webrev&d=DwID-
> > > g&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
> > > 
> > 
> 
CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=mZM8IR4e_zmrfcsF3XJjoGEMrZb4WtEL7Y6Ugd6Naqg&s=sZ2UKqqUIq0El-
> > > RsqYz6jmTh4Q2UghwdrQX6of8Lw0E&e= 
> > > > 
> > > > Best Regards
> > > > 
> > > > Adam Farley
> > > > IBM Runtimes
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote on 12/08/2019 
04:55:36:
> > > > 
> > > >> From: David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>
> > > >> To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>,
> > > >> "serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com" <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>
> > > >> Cc: hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > > >> Date: 12/08/2019 04:56
> > > >> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227021:  VM fails if any 
sun.boot.library.path
> > > >> paths are longer than JVM_MAXPATHLEN
> > > >> 
> > > >> Hi Adam,
> > > >> 
> > > >> On 10/08/2019 2:47 am, Adam Farley8 wrote:
> > > >> > Hi Serguei, David,
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > My turn to apologise for the delay. :)
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > I've modified the code as per Serguei's request. Take a look 
> >  and let me
> > > >> > know if this is the sort of thing you were thinking of.
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > Webrev: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
> > > >> 
u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Eafarley_8227021.3_webrev_&d=DwID-
> > > >> g&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
> > > >> CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=8Wa8Zdfmvn-
> > > >> 
> > > 
> > 
> 
yvzvCAhOyJ_etFblRA4vmLGbKF4aW8PY&s=L19aeFXoR9JIO62QRPFzZObIU8RbhpCtXSvUibD2ISk&e=
> > > >> 
> > > >> I'd prefer to see the helper just as a file static function 
> rather  than
> > > >> adding it to the os class.
> > > >> 
> > > >> +  * supplied array of arrays of chars (a), where n
> > > >> 
> > > >> I assume (a) is meant to refer to the parameter, but you 
> actually  called
> > > >> it arrayarray. I think "a" or "arr" would suffice.
> > > >> 
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> David
> > > >> 
> > > >> > Best Regards
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > Adam Farley
> > > >> > IBM Runtimes
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > "serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com" <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com> 
 wrote on
> > > >> > 31/07/2019 17:18:05:
> > > >> > 
> > > >> >> From: "serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com" 
<serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>
> > > >> >> To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>,  David  Holmes
> > > >> >> <david.holmes at oracle.com>
> > > >> >> Cc: serviceability-dev <serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net>,
> > > >> >> hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > > >> >> Date: 31/07/2019 17:18
> > > >> >> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227021:  VM fails if any 
> sun.boot.library.path
> > > >> >> paths are longer than JVM_MAXPATHLEN
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> Hi Adam,
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> It looks Okay to me.
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> A couple of minor comments.
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
> > > >> u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Eafarley_8227021.
> > > >> 2_webrev_src_hotspot_&d=DwID-g&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> > > >> 
siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=8Wa8Zdfmvn-
> > > >> 
> > > 
> > 
> 
yvzvCAhOyJ_etFblRA4vmLGbKF4aW8PY&s=NL6tYuwwDod3DSmj-1ztxAywpO8L52HEyO0wvTR05bs&e=
> > > >> >> share/runtime/os.cpp.frames.html
> > > >> > 
> > > >> >> 1362       //release  allocated storage  before exiting the vm
> > > >> >> 1363       while (i > 0) {
> > > >> >> 1364           i--;
> > > >> >> 1365           if (opath[i] != NULL)  {
> > > >> >> 1366             FREE_C_HEAP_ARRAY(char,   opath[i]);
> > > >> >> 1367           }
> > > >> >> 1368       }
> > > >> >> 1369       FREE_C_HEAP_ARRAY(char*, opath);
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> 1377       //release allocated storage before  returning  null
> > > >> >> 1378       while (i > 0) {
> > > >> >> 1379           i--;
> > > >> >> 1380           if (opath[i] != NULL)  {
> > > >> >> 1381             FREE_C_HEAP_ARRAY(char,   opath[i]);
> > > >> >> 1382           }
> > > >> >> 1383       }
> > > >> >> 1384       FREE_C_HEAP_ARRAY(char*, opath);
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> This duplicated fragments is worth to refactor to a function.
> > > >> >> Also a space is missed at the beginning of the comment.
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> Thanks,
> > > >> >> Serguei
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> On 7/31/19 02:01, Adam Farley8 wrote:
> > > >> >> Hi All, 
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> Reviewers requested for the change below.
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> @David - Agreed. Would you be prepared to sponsor the change?
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> Bug: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
> > > >> u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8227021&d=DwID-
> > > >> g&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
> > > >> CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=8Wa8Zdfmvn-
> > > >> 
> > > 
> > 
> 
yvzvCAhOyJ_etFblRA4vmLGbKF4aW8PY&s=xykJ0KLy9AKWO8zmC0amfR7xxUsvyKEjlf3y7WWOqvE&e=
> > > >> >> Webrev: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
> > > >> 
u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Eafarley_8227021.2_webrev_&d=DwID-
> > > >> g&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
> > > >> CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=8Wa8Zdfmvn-
> > > >> 
> > > 
> > 
> 
yvzvCAhOyJ_etFblRA4vmLGbKF4aW8PY&s=NvIza4VVWG3CiDhmQVmXsghH_4h_c5mFJbHwkCUcut0&e=
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> Best Regards
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> Adam Farley 
> > > >> >> IBM Runtimes
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> P.S. Remembered to add the links this time. :)
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote on 
30/07/2019 03:37:53:
> > > >> >> 
> > > >> >> > From: David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> 
> > > >> >> > To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com> 
> > > >> >> > Cc: hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net, serviceability-dev
> > > >> >> > <serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net> 
> > > >> >> > Date: 30/07/2019 03:38 
> > > >> >> > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227021: VM fails if any 
> sun.boot.library.path
> > > >> >> > paths are longer than JVM_MAXPATHLEN 
> > > >> >> > 
> > > >> >> > Hi Adam,
> > > >> >> > 
> > > >> >> > On 25/07/2019 3:57 am, Adam Farley8 wrote:
> > > >> >> > > Hi David,
> > > >> >> > > 
> > > >> >> > > Welcome back. :)
> > > >> >> > 
> > > >> >> > Thanks. Sorry for the delay in getting back to this.
> > > >> >> > 
> > > >> >> > I like .v2 as it is much simpler (notwithstanding freeing  
> > > the  already
> > > >> >> > allocated arrays adds some complexity - thanks for fixing 
 that).
> > > >> >> > 
> > > >> >> > I'm still not sure we can't optimise things better for 
>  unchangeable
> > > >> >> > properties like the boot libary path, but that's another 
 RFE.
> > > >> >> > 
> > > >> >> > Thanks,
> > > >> >> > David
> > > >> >> > 
> > > >> >> Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > >> >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales 
 with
> > > >> >> number 741598. 
> > > >> >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,  
> > > Hampshire  PO6 3AU
> > > >> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > >> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales 
> >  with number
> > > >> > 741598.
> > > >> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, 
> > > Hampshire  PO6 3AU
> > > >> 
> > > > 
> > > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales 
> with number 
> > > > 741598.
> > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, 
> Hampshire PO6 3AU
> > > 
> > 
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with 
> > number 741598. 
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 
3AU
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with 
> number 741598. 
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 
3AU

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU



More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list