RFR [XS] : 8229182: runtime/containers/docker/TestMemoryAwareness.java test fails on SLES12
Bob Vandette
bob.vandette at oracle.com
Fri Aug 16 12:36:24 UTC 2019
Instead of adding this: opts.appendTestJavaOptions = false;
Try adding these lines:
String javaHeapSize = new String(sizeToAllocInMb/2) + “m”;
opts.addJavaOpts("-Xmx" + javaHeapSize);
This will set the max Java Heap to 1/2 of the size that we will attempt to allocate.
This should reliably cause an OOM exception.
Bob.
> On Aug 16, 2019, at 4:14 AM, Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we not set -Xmx explicitly after any test options have been
>> appended so that it takes precedence?
>
> Hi Bob, do you have a good estimate for an Xmx to set ?
>
>> It seems fragile to disable
>> appinding all test options altogether. Clearly, this test is
>> susceptible to passed -Xmx options.
>
> We have here a java - execution taking place in the docker container, not the test machine itself .
> I am not sure , are the "regular" test options so good for this special execution ? Some maybe are , some aren’t ...
>
> E.g. we ended up with
>
> -Xmx768m -Djava.awt.headless=true
>
> and more strange settings in the "docker run" call because of this ...
>
> Best regards, Matthias
>
>
>
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 06:10 +0000, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
>>>> Unfortunately we do not see the expected
>> "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError"
>>>> in the nightly test runs .
>>>>
>>>> When I execute the jtreg test locally on the same (!) ppc64le machine ,
>>>> under the same user but not from the test framework we use nightly
>>>> the "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError" shows up.
>>>
>>> Hello, after looking a bit more into it, we observed that the nightly runs
>> set a higher -Xmx = 768m value that gets inherited into the
>> DockerRunOptions
>>> And made the central test fail .
>>> So I had to remove this :
>>>
>>> 105 // make sure we avoid Xmx settings from the jtreg vmoptions
>>> 106 opts.appendTestJavaOptions = false;
>>
>> Can we not set -Xmx explicitly after any test options have been
>> appended so that it takes precedence? It seems fragile to disable
>> appinding all test options altogether. Clearly, this test is
>> susceptible to passed -Xmx options.
>>
>> Failing that, could we just omit the -Xmx option?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Severin
>>
>>> New webrev :
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8229182.2/
>>>
>>> Best regards, Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Christoph,
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>
>>>>> looks good to me in general.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I'm not convinced that line 114
>>>>> ".shouldContain("java.lang.OutOfMemoryError");" won't provoke a
>> test
>>>>> error in case the child process was killed by the container, e.g. exited
>> with
>>>>> exit code 137. We should at least run this patch for several days in our
>>>> system
>>>>> to see if it catches all variations of the problem.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately we do not see the expected
>> "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError"
>>>> in the nightly test runs .
>>>>
>>>> When I execute the jtreg test locally on the same (!) ppc64le machine ,
>>>> under the same user but not from the test framework we use nightly
>>>> the "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError" shows up.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards, Matthias
>>>>
>>>>
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list