RFR: [XS] 8229284: [TESTBUG] jdk/internal/platform/cgroup/TestCgroupMetrics.java fails for - memory:getMemoryUsage
Severin Gehwolf
sgehwolf at redhat.com
Wed Aug 28 08:51:21 UTC 2019
On Thu, 2019-08-15 at 16:08 +0000, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229284
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8229284.3/
Hmm, unrelated to this bug, but still an issue:
It appears the failure message is bogus when the test fails. It should
be:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Test failed for - memory:getMemoryUsage, expected [56200986624], got [56019386368]
I.e. the old/new values need to be swapped here:
597 fail(SubSystem.MEMORY, "getMemoryUsage", newMemoryUsage, memoryUsage);
Same for the getMemoryMaxUsage() fail:
592 fail(SubSystem.MEMORY, "getMemoryMaxUsage", newMemoryMaxUsage,
593 memoryMaxUsage);
As to the bug. It suggests the memoryUsage code causes problems, not
memoryMaxUsage.
587 // allocate memory in a loop and check more than once for new values
588 // otherwise we might see seldom the effect of decreasing new memory values
589 // e.g. because the system could free up memory
590 byte[][] bytes = new byte[32][];
591 for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
592 bytes[i] = new byte[8*1024*1024];
593 newMemoryMaxUsage = metrics.getMemoryMaxUsage();
594 newMemoryUsage = metrics.getMemoryUsage();
595 if (newMemoryMaxUsage > memoryMaxUsage && newMemoryUsage > memoryUsage) {
596 break;
597 }
Do we really need to call metrics.getMemoryMaxUsage() in that loop? I'd
expect for the following code to work more reliably as the max usage is
supposed to capture the high water mark. If memoryMaxUsage ever
decreases, it's a bug in the cgroups accounting system right?
byte[][] bytes = new byte[32][];
for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
bytes[i] = new byte[8*1024*1024];
newMemoryUsage = metrics.getMemoryUsage();
if (newMemoryUsage > memoryUsage) {
break;
}
}
newMemoryMaxUsage = metrics.getMemoryMaxUsage();
// assert things
Perhaps even assert prior the loop:
if (memoryMaxUsage < memoryUsage) {
throw new RuntimeException("cgroup accounting bug?");
}
Thanks,
Severin
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list