RFR JDK-8234049: Implementation of Memory Access API (Incubator)
Maurizio Cimadamore
maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
Fri Dec 6 08:48:49 UTC 2019
On 05/12/2019 23:27, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
> This gives same performance as with -XX:+TrustFinalNonStaticFields -
> if we remove these changes, then memory segment bounds are never
> inlined. I'm happy to change this if you have other suggestions on how
> to get there, of course (I can run some benchmarks w/ and w/o and post
> some numbers if that helps).
Here are some numbers for a straight VH get using a constant address;
with the patch I get this (throughput - higher the better):
GetSetConstantBenchmark.testMemoryHandleGet --> 299325598.056 ±
160635.595 ops/s
Without the patch I get this:
GetSetConstantBenchmark.testMemoryHandleGet --> 163721200.469 ±
2344351.046 ops/s
So, the difference is quiet big. Graal (using JVMCI) seems less
sensitive to this particular issue, and I detected no differences there.
That said, if we have plans to fix this another way, I'm happy to remove
this workaround.
Cheers
Maurizio
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list