RFR (tedious) 8216022: Use #pragma once
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Fri Jan 4 13:16:25 UTC 2019
On 1/3/19 6:39 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 1/3/19 3:50 PM, Erik Österlund wrote:
>
>> I think the value of moving to #pragma once instead of using include
>> guards is that it is easy to mess up include guards. Admittedly, at
>> least I tend to get them wrong quite often, and every time I get
>> annoyed that we don't use #pragma once
>
>
>> ... Might be exaggerating a bit... but still.
>
> Maybe. :-)
>
> But seriously, how often do you actually have to create a new header
> file, or even edit the part of a header file that touched the
> include guards? The reason this bug hasn't got much love at GCC is
> that over there nobody (including, until today, me) could ever see
> the point of include guards. It seems to me that they are a rather
> fragile way of fixing a nonexistent problem.
Sorry, this should have been that pragma once is a rather fragile way of
fixing a nonexistent problem.
> But hey, if it's really important to you, go ahead. This issue isn't
> something I'm prepared to go to the barricades for.
--
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list