RFR (S) 8217879: hs_err should print more instructions in hex dump

Aleksey Shipilev shade at redhat.com
Wed Jan 30 12:20:39 UTC 2019


On 1/30/19 1:11 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> I think this probing is not needed anymorewith 8217994, or?

It probably does not, but 8217994 should get in first.
I implore everyone to stop with bikeshedding patches to death, meanwhile.

-Aleksey



More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list