RFR: 8223438: add VirtualizationInformation JFR event
Baesken, Matthias
matthias.baesken at sap.com
Tue May 14 08:01:30 UTC 2019
Thanks Erik , good to hear !
May I get a second review ?
Best regards, Matthias
From: Erik Gahlin <erik.gahlin at oracle.com>
Sent: Freitag, 10. Mai 2019 15:15
To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com>; 'hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net' <hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: RFR: 8223438: add VirtualizationInformation JFR event
Looks good.
Erik
Hello, here is the next webrev with adjusted coding following your suggestion :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8223438.2/<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Embaesken/webrevs/8223438.2/>
Best regards, Matthias
From: Baesken, Matthias
Sent: Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2019 09:03
To: Erik Gahlin <erik.gahlin at oracle.com><mailto:erik.gahlin at oracle.com>; 'hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net>' <hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net><mailto:hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net>
Subject: RE: RFR: 8223438: add VirtualizationInformation JFR event
Hi Erik, the virtualization names are a set of fix names , so I think we can do what you suggest .
I just "borrowed" a bit from the code above ...
TRACE_REQUEST_FUNC(OSInformation) {
ResourceMark rm;
char* os_name = NEW_RESOURCE_ARRAY(char, 2048);
JfrOSInterface::os_version(&os_name);
EventOSInformation event;
event.set_osVersion(os_name);
event.commit();
}
... where a ResourceMark + allocation is used (but in jfrOSInterface I wonder about the second allocation in string.stream.as_string , do we really need two here ?
int JfrOSInterface::JfrOSInterfaceImpl::os_version(char** os_version) const {
assert(os_version != NULL, "os_version pointer is NULL!");
stringStream os_ver_info;
os::print_os_info_brief(&os_ver_info);
*os_version = os_ver_info.as_string(); <--- second alloc
Best regards, Matthias
From: Erik Gahlin <erik.gahlin at oracle.com<mailto:erik.gahlin at oracle.com>>
Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2019 18:55
To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com<mailto:matthias.baesken at sap.com>>; 'hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net>' <hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net>>
Subject: Re: RFR: 8223438: add VirtualizationInformation JFR event
Hello,
Looks good, but do we really need to allocate the name every time an event is emitted in jfrPeriodic.cpp?
It will not matter much from a performance perspective, but the code would look cleaner if we would have.
EventVirtualizationInformation event;
event.set_name(JfrOSInterface::virtualization_name());
event.commit();
Thanks
Erik
Hello, please review the following change .
It adds a simple VirtualizationInformation event to JFR .
The addition to JFR has been previously proposed by Erik when we discussed the enhancement of hs_error file output with virtualization related information .
Bug/webrev :
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223438
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8223438.1/<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Embaesken/webrevs/8223438.1/>
Thanks, Matthias
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list