RFR(S): 8230422: Convert uninterruptible os::sleep calls to os::naked_short_sleep
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Wed Sep 4 22:08:03 UTC 2019
Hi Kim,
Thanks for looking at this!
FTR I should have mentioned Kim is the one who suggested this particular
migration.
Cheers,
David
On 5/09/2019 2:25 am, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> On Sep 4, 2019, at 5:39 AM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8230422
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8230422/webrev/
>>
>> This is mostly a mechanical change from os::sleep to os::naked_short_sleep or os::naked_sleep, but it affects code in runtime, jfr, compiler and GC. The patch file is best to use for review purposes.
>>
>> Summary of changes:
>> - added os::naked_sleep as a wrapper around os::naked_short_sleep for sleeps longer than 1 second** - not usable by JavaThreads
>> - os::sleep now only has the old interruptible path and takes a JavaThread parameter rather than thread
>> - changed os::sleep(thread,millis,false) to os::naked_short_sleep(millis) or os::naked_sleep(millis) depending on the timeout value
>> - changed os::sleep(thread,millis,true) to os::sleep(thread,millis) with checks/changes where needed to ensure "thread" is a JavaThread
>>
>> ** Many of the calls to this use a VM flag to define the timeout. That either defaults to 1 or 0 (not used) but is otherwise unconstrained in value. While sleeps longer than one second don't really make sense I didn't want to preclude them without there being a range check in place for the flag itself.
>>
>> Testing: tiers 1- 3
>>
>> I'd appreciate it if someone involved with Shenandoah can check the one change in that code.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>
> Looks good.
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list