RFR(M/T) : 8243935 : s.h.WhiteBoxPermission must be ClassFileInstall-ed together w/ s.h.WhiteBox

[Igor Ignatyev]

uploaded http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8243935/8243935.01.patch

-- Igor

> On Apr 28, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Stefan Karlsson <stefan.karlsson at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2020-04-28 18:16, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>> 
>> I guess you are interested only in an actual patch, if so I would rather just use hg diff to get the patch and attach/upload it b/c, by some reasons, webrev takes a lot of time to be generated.
> 
> Sure. hg diff works.
> 
> StefanK
> 
>> 
>> -- Igor
>> 
>>> On Apr 28, 2020, at 8:57 AM, Stefan Karlsson <stefan.karlsson at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Igor,
>>> 
>>> On 2020-04-28 17:30, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>>>> Hi David, Stefan,
>>>> 
>>>> there is no issue, this patch is just a spin-off of other patch I was working on. I noticed that some tests copy WhiteBoxPermission and other don't, so I decided to clean this up. I completely forgot about the hack we did in ClassFileInstaller (I guess partially b/c we still have tests which copy WhiteBoxPermission explicitly) so now I think it's better to just remove all explicit copying of WhiteBox$WhiteBoxPermission (which kinda echoes Stefan's patch). this of course touches more files, on the bright side this makes them all neater. so I run sed '/^\s*\*\s*sun.hotspot.WhiteBox\$WhiteBoxPermission/'d to remove all WhiteBoxPermission, and them removed some leftovers in 'containers/docker':
>>>> - full webrev:
>>>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8243935/webrev.01/
>>> Your open.patch is incorrectly generated and reflects the earlier patch:
>>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8243935/webrev.01/open.changeset
>>> 
>>> It's a bug in webrev, but I don't remember under what circumstances it occurs. Could you rerun with: -r qparent -c 8243935 -C -N and see if it works better?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> StefanK
>>> 
>>>>> 656 lines changed: 0 ins; 612 del; 44 mod;
>>>> - incremental webrev:
>>>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8243935/webrev.0-1/
>>>>> 722 lines changed: 0 ins; 719 del; 3 mod;
>>>> if we agree that this is the way to go, I'll repurpose 8243935 to remove WhiteBoxPermission (and obviously will retest the patch).
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -- Igor
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:49 AM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 28/04/2020 5:34 pm, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> I have another idea. Can't we simply remove WhiteBoxPermission and incorporate that functionality in the WhiteBox class? We would then be able to remove all these WhiteBoxPermission lines.
>>>>> Interesting though a little hackish. :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> But why is this an issue anyway we already hacked ClassfileInstaller to ensure it always copies the permission class!!!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 102     // Add commonly used inner classes that are often omitted by mistake. Currently
>>>>> 103     // we support only sun.hotspot.WhiteBox$WhiteBoxPermission. See JDK-8199290
>>>>> 104     private static String[] addInnerClasses(String[] classes, int startIdx) {
>>>>> 105         boolean seenWB = false;
>>>>> 106         boolean seenWBInner = false;
>>>>> 107         final String wb = "sun.hotspot.WhiteBox";
>>>>> 108         final String wbInner = "sun.hotspot.WhiteBox$WhiteBoxPermission";
>>>>> 
>>>>> David
>>>>> -----
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've tested this and it seems to work:
>>>>>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/prototype/removeWhiteBoxPermission/webrev.01/ Summary of changes:    695 lines changed: 0 ins; 657 del; 38 mod; 60752 unchg
>>>>>> The interesting code:
>>>>>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/prototype/removeWhiteBoxPermission/webrev.01/test/lib/sun/hotspot/WhiteBox.java.udiff.html (There are some parts of the patch that was butchered by the sed-script - I'll fix this if we agree that this is a good thing to do)
>>>>>> If you think this is something we should do, I'll create an RFE, complete the patch, run more tests, and send it out for review.
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> StefanK
>>>>>> On 2020-04-28 08:08, David Holmes wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/04/2020 3:37 pm, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 27, 2020, at 10:03 PM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi Igor,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 28/04/2020 12:32 pm, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8243935/webrev.00/
>>>>>>>>>>> 338 lines changed: 107 ins; 0 del; 231 mod
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>> could you please review the trivial yet tedious patch which adds 'sun.hotspot.WhiteBox$WhiteBoxPermission' to all 'ClassFileInstaller sun.hotspot.WhiteBox' actions?
>>>>>>>>>> the patch also
>>>>>>>>>>   - replaces '@run main ClassFileInstaller' w/ '@run driver ClassFileInstaller'
>>>>>>>>>>   - unifies the way ClassFileInstaller sun.hotspot.WhiteBox are aligned
>>>>>>>>> That alignment change is unnecessary and makes it very hard to review this patch.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8243935
>>>>>>>>>> webrevs:
>>>>>>>>>>   - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8243935/webrev.00/ -- regular webrev
>>>>>>>>>>   - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8243935/webrev.00.including_ws -- shows "whitespace only" changes
>>>>>>>>> I'd like to see the patch that leaves out the whitespace-only changes - is that possible?
>>>>>>>> sure, I've used `hg diff -w` (--ignore-all-space    ignore white space when comparing lines) to remove all whitespace changes, here is webrev -- http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8243935/webrev.00.w/
>>>>>>> Thanks that was somewhat better. Change seems okay.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -- Igor
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> -- Igor
>