Testing assistance requested: ARM/PPC/S390 and a little Aarch64
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Mon Feb 10 16:17:44 UTC 2020
On 2/10/20 7:15 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> I was hoping some folk may be able to take this preliminary patch for a
> spin for me as I don't have access to a full range of hardware:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8234372/webrev/
>
> The patch relates to:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234372
>
> 'Investigate use of Thread::stack_base() and queries for "in stack"'
>
> The main functional changes here are in frame::safe_for_sender where we
> bring ARM/PPC/S390/Sparc into line with x86 and Aarch64 with regards to
> incorrect uses of >= or <= when comparing values with Thread::stack_base().
>
> In addition this standardises the main sp safety check to reuse
> Thread::is_in_usable_stack().
>
> And finally (with regards to the testing request) it fixes the validity
> check for "locals" wrt. Thread::stack_base().
Looks OK. Passes all smoke tests; is there anything else you'd like me to
do?
--
Andrew Haley (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list