Testing assistance requested: ARM/PPC/S390 and a little Aarch64

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Mon Feb 10 16:17:44 UTC 2020


On 2/10/20 7:15 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> I was hoping some folk may be able to take this preliminary patch for a 
> spin for me as I don't have access to a full range of hardware:
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8234372/webrev/
> 
> The patch relates to:
> 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234372
> 
> 'Investigate use of Thread::stack_base() and queries for "in stack"'
> 
> The main functional changes here are in frame::safe_for_sender where we 
> bring ARM/PPC/S390/Sparc into line with x86 and Aarch64 with regards to 
> incorrect uses of >= or <= when comparing values with Thread::stack_base().
> 
> In addition this standardises the main sp safety check to reuse 
> Thread::is_in_usable_stack().
> 
> And finally (with regards to the testing request) it fixes the validity 
> check for "locals" wrt. Thread::stack_base().

Looks OK. Passes all smoke tests; is there anything else you'd like me to
do?

-- 
Andrew Haley  (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671



More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list